WIP: XB-975 Stealth Bomber
-
Hi Starstriker!
Sorry, not really constructive I must admit … but please … don’t :
Not really kind towards BMS friends spending a lot of time trying to develop something as “serious” as possible. Deviating BMS into a sandbox tool like Kerbal might not be really appreciated :neutral: (even if they do not say anything).
My 2 cents.
There are a lot of VERY good Spaceship sim available like Elite Dangerous for instance :
http://static.giantbomb.com/uploads/original/0/3694/2626715-peek_of_the_week_12.jpg
EDIT:
Let me be more constructive
If you are a good 3D modeler, there are a lot more valuable for BMS community like revamping some very old existing models like the Tu-95, or the AH-64 … etc … or SAMs/vehicles models … all those models are much more needed than experimental fictitious stealth bombers … maybe … if you like to add your stone into this adventure, maybe ou could consider something more valuable (?)
But in that case, please, do it the right way (take care about copyrighted materials) and coordinates with current BMS modelers to avoid to start a model which is already WIP, and pay attention to our policy about 3rd party development rules (IMPORTANT!).
Some links which could be helpful for you (especially if you are newcomer):
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?6670-PLEASE-READ-THIS-BEFORE-MODDING-BMS
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?7220-Modelling-Organisation
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/content.php?131
…
And finally, let me introduce you some of our best contributors:
@ Dee-Jay Well thanks for the critisim, it does help. But honstly and this is just me personally i think there should be another stealth bomber in the game.
@FanofBMS432 I should probably edit my statement about the next gen avionics suite and and radar detection because now that i think about it im not gonna be able to do that kind of thing with the limitations of BMS
@Shadow Thanks i appreciate it -
This post is deleted! -
Why?
The F117 and the B2 if working correctly in their respective tasks and if you see them only operating by night, knows that it is normal and on purpose (stealth).
Additionally, even if BMS would need (for some reasons) another (?) stealth bomber, the XB-975 do not exist, how to set it without drifting away from the simulation.
Finally … BMS campaign engine is not really made for last gen a/c … so all Stealth technology, and AESA radar (F-22/F35 etc …) are off and can’t work properly due to code limitations and ATM/database design.Unless you are just amused by playing the sandbox, there is not point for the global community. Too bad.
Cheers.
I completely agree with the above, what is the point of adding a non-existing AC on a simulation ? As said, a lot of existing AC still need some love….
-
BECAUSE LASERS!!!
-
Why?
The F117 and the B2 if working correctly in their respective tasks and if you see them only operating by night, knows that it is normal and on purpose (stealth).
Additionally, even if BMS would need (for some reasons) another (?) stealth bomber, the XB-975 do not exist, how to set it without drifting away from the simulation.
Finally … BMS campaign engine is not really made for last gen a/c … so all Stealth technology, and AESA radar (F-22/F35 etc …) are off and can’t work properly due to code limitations and ATM/database design.Unless you are just amused by playing the sandbox, there is not point for the global community. Too bad.
Cheers.
I completely agree with the above, what is the point of adding a non-existing AC on a simulation ? As said, a lot of existing AC still need some love….
Okay, okay guys i get it jeez.
I was only trying my hand at trying to offer something to the community. Ah well looks like my modeling dreams just died.
so i will try my best to maybe make a F-14 or the F/A-18 cockpit who knows.
Thanks for killing my creativity dee-jay and I3Crusader. (no hard feelings)
-
Okay, okay guys i get it jeez.
I was only trying my hand at trying to offer something to the community. Ah well looks like my modeling dreams just died.
so i will try my best to maybe make a F-14 or the F/A-18 cockpit who knows.
Thanks for killing my creativity dee-jay and I3Crusader. (no hard feelings)
Both of those are allready in the works, so why not take DeeJays advice and work on something that is needing and upgrade?
-
Okay, okay guys i get it jeez.
I was only trying my hand at trying to offer something to the community. Ah well looks like my modeling dreams just died.
so i will try my best to maybe make a F-14 or the F/A-18 cockpit who knows.
Thanks for killing my creativity dee-jay and I3Crusader. (no hard feelings)
Both of those are allready in the works, so why not take DeeJays advice and work on something that is needing an upgrade?
-
Both of those are allready in the works, so why not take DeeJays advice and work on something that is needing an upgrade?
Okay then, what should i work on upgrading?
what needs work is the better question
-
If you really look to create useful models, I suggest working on F-4 or A-10 external models. Create full models in BMS limits (i.e 30K tris max for LOD 0) with low level LODs and all, THAT would be really useful
Also there is of course a handful of ground vehicles that require a new model. If you can create some in the BMS limits, that would be awesome.
-
If you really look to create useful models, I suggest working on F-4 or A-10 external models. Create full models in BMS limits (i.e 30K tris max for LOD 0) with low level LODs and all, THAT would be really useful
Also there is of course a handful of ground vehicles that require a new model. If you can create some in the BMS limits, that would be awesome.
Thanks for the list and i hope that I can do some of these for you guys
-
Thanks for the list and i hope that I can do some of these for you guys
Yeah F-4 will be awesome until the EMF to come out.
EDIT: OH MY GOD I JUST SAW THAT EMF IS OUT!!! SANTA CLAUS IS REAL!!!
-
I was only trying my hand at trying to offer something to the community. Ah well looks like my modeling dreams just died.
[…]
Thanks for killing my creativity dee-jay and I3Crusader. (no hard feelings)Dont take it the wrong way, its just that, as DeeJay put it, the BMS team is focused on realism… so we indeed prefer realism to creativity
Humvees, LAVs and their variants, BTR-80 (for infantry fighting vehicules), M88 and MT55 (repair vehicules), chinese tanks (type 60 to 90), most ships (especially the russian ones)
AH-64s, CH-46 and 47, MD-500 for helicopters…
A-50 Mainstay and IL-76…
Or a U-2 / TR-1 if you are into spaceship looking aircrafts :mrgreen:
-
This post is deleted! -
What about a F-302?
Two yens of mine in the basket!
-
This post is deleted! -
Dee-Jay, there is something you don’t understand, Starstriker just wants to enjoy creating for the ones who are interested for his job.
He might have zero interest for realistic stuff, he just wants to dream a little bit…
I would find funny to have a good Xwing model in BMS… Why? just to have fun… Nothong serious. Just fun, like stupid funny imgur cartoons people love to forward by email.
I feel, considering your relevant remark is also a little bit like telling a Porsche lover to buy a Maserati… A matter of taste…
As long as he is happy, and it is 100% transparent to us, no problem.
-
You are right, I am out of topic.
Cheers.
-
-
Okay then
-