WIP: T-14 Armata
-
Molni OK, I suggest to re-evaluate all such bugs or issues when the next version will come out (3-4 weeks it is…), then I guess we will all be smarter to see what’s really need fixing. Some stuff of course isn’t possible to fix fast so some stuff will need to wait for later for a rewrite kind of fix, but we aren’t ignoring.
I would have told you to create a TE for example of a bug, but I guess it’s too hard now for the devs to find anything on 4.32, so let’s just wait and see later.
-
Great.
But why only now I can get the feedback? If anybody does not get feedback is hard to know what is worth to do.Come on Molni, I told you via MP that we were working on SAMs and that I took some of your comments in consideration for missiles data (but has been re-worked again later by Cruz for specifics reasons )
I do not understand how should I interpret this.
Just forget about MIG21 variants or F-105 (working a/c IIRC) … etc … rather list what is pure unfinished “garbage” which will probably never finished, like Agusta A109, unused missiles, … etc …
Ok, I will make such a list but I cannot give ETA.
Do not worry at all … do it slowly (if you wanna do it) and do not do too much. A little bit, (the most important to your eyes) then wait and see if it is considered. If yes, continue a little bit … etc … Baby step after baby step.
Just try. Will see. (?)
-
First leave my battalions alone… They are fine. :lol:
Second… Yeap I’ll say it could devs stop trolling that much on the 3-4 weeks of the 4.33? It’s our job. Unless you believe we’re not that good. :rofl:
Third very nice model m8 any skin preview?
Any video on the wip?Forth thanx for your time and efforts.
-
Come on Molni, I told you via MP that we were working on SAMs and that I took some of your comments in consideration for missiles data (but has been re-worked again later by Cruz for specifics reasons )
Just forget about MIG21 variants or F-105 (working a/c IIRC) … etc … rather list what is pure unfinished “garbage” which will probably never finished, like Agusta A109, unused missiles, … etc …
Do not worry at all … do it slowly (if you wanna do it) and do not do too much. A little bit, (the most important to your eyes) then wait and see if it is considered. If yes, continue a little bit … etc … Baby step after baby step.
Just try. Will see. (?)
Rgr. About AD likely I can provide more concerning to RL and how should model the battalion structure.
-
Rgr. About AD likely I can provide more concerning to RL and how should model the battalion structure.
Monli, we said cleaning the unused “garbage” sruff, not re-defining rosters.
-
Monli, we said cleaning the unused “garbage” sruff, not re-defining rosters.
I know this is just a new topic what I opened in my mind.
I learned many thins from Hpaps. Very likely I will test on with my Korea '80s theater. Is chance that I remake all campaign OOB and battalion rosters later according what I learned in the latest months.
-
I know this is just a new topic what I opened in my mind.
Then you are free to open a new topic, DJ and you already derailed this one enough
-
Then you are free to open a new topic, DJ and you already derailed this one enough
I will do it in my suggestion topic.
-
…since nobody until now took the time to seriously study and consider a real and deep DB “cleaning”.
COUGHHustlerRam22COUGH
-
COUGHHustlerRam22COUGH
I meant, from our BMS side. (Can’t do everything at the same time.)
-
@Molny
“how can be made T-14 to be better and different from T-90 or any older MBT”?
What is different between the T-90 and T-14?
Let’s compare …
T-90
Mobility:- Weight 46,5 T
- Power: Max 1100 KW (W-96 engine)
- Max speed: 65 km/h, reach 650 km
Firepower: - barrel 125 mm (2A46M)
- Gun 7,62 mm (PKT)
- Gun 12,7 mm ( NSWT or Kord)
- 1A4GT integrated fire control system
Self protection: - explosive reactive armour.
- Shtora system (OTSzU-1-7)
- Smoke grenades…
- Distribution of ammunition as in T-72BW ( “flying tower” ;))
T-14
- Weight 48 T
- Power: Max 1500 KW
- Max speed: 80 km/h, reach 500 km
Firepower: - barrel 125 mm (2A82-1M)
- gun 30 mm and 12,7 mm
- Fire control probably the same as in T-90 SM
Self protection:
This is something new. The entire crew hidden in the front, behind thick armor. - Of course explosive reactive armour too.
- APS radar/launchers
- Smoke grenades… etc…
What is different or better between them?
T-14:- Is bigger
- A more powerful engine
- Slightly better barrel, little longer (keep in mind that the Russian ammunition is worse than German or US … (think Leopard or M1A1)
- The most important change is the end of “flying tower” because ammunition is only in the rear of the turret, even more secure as M1 and Leo …
Tell me please what you want different between them in Falcon?
BTW. I made this model for some theater on the Baltic Sea, just for candy eye.
Cheers,
Eghi -
-
@Molny
What is different between the T-90 and T-14?
Let’s compare …
T-90
Mobility:- Weight 46,5 T
- Power: Max 1100 KW (W-96 engine)
- Max speed: 65 km/h, reach 650 km
Firepower: - barrel 125 mm (2A46M)
- Gun 7,62 mm (PKT)
- Gun 12,7 mm ( NSWT or Kord)
- 1A4GT integrated fire control system
Self protection: - explosive reactive armour.
- Shtora system (OTSzU-1-7)
- Smoke grenades…
- Distribution of ammunition as in T-72BW ( “flying tower” ;))
T-14
- Weight 48 T
- Power: Max 1500 KW
- Max speed: 80 km/h, reach 500 km
Firepower: - barrel 125 mm (2A82-1M)
- gun 30 mm and 12,7 mm
- Fire control probably the same as in T-90 SM
Self protection:
This is something new. The entire crew hidden in the front, behind thick armor. - Of course explosive reactive armour too.
- APS radar/launchers
- Smoke grenades… etc…
What is different or better between them?
T-14:- Is bigger
- A more powerful engine
- Slightly better barrel, little longer (keep in mind that the Russian ammunition is worse than German or US … (think Leopard or M1A1)
- The most important change is the end of “flying tower” because ammunition is only in the rear of the turret, even more secure as M1 and Leo …
Tell me please what you want different between them in Falcon?
BTW. I made this model for some theater on the Baltic Sea, just for candy eye.
Cheers,
EghiDear Eghi and all,
To my very point of view evolution is the key for any developement. T-14 has a place in BMS as in represents the future of Russia’s and allies cavalery assets.
BMS is not made to keep stuck to the 80’s. BMS is made to evolve, and, step by step, it converges to something reasonably close to the reality.
So, yes, to my very own point of view, your T-14 is a great addition, and is totally relevant.
Thank you for your work,
Your friend Radium