AG radar in BMS
-
I think they are not asking for light source (sun) shading, rather for signal (radar) shading.
Yep, radar shading depending on height and angle (LOS).
-
After reading this, along with the other improvement wish list threads, I think it is time we accept that the only way we will be able to meet future BMS user desired features is to infiltrate the US Military with our own people in real time to obtain the necessary data the devs need to model. No more short term solutions, we need a long range plan. May I suggest that we recruit from within:
1. Have all members identify military age family members
2. Dev’s choose best candidates and assign them to enlist in the specific service where information is desired, and volunteer for the specific job with that branch (in this case, radar technician for F-16’s, etc) where the information is needed by devs.This means updates could take a longer, 5-6 years possibly (if we start now), but man, will it be accurate! Ok, my moment of jesting is complete.
Sorry to say, but I think your comment can be potentially harmful for the team member, the forum itself and work plan.
Have to agree here… I know you mean it as a joke, but this is the kind of thing that is best not to be joked about. Not everyone has a sense of humor
-
No harm intended.
-
No harm intended.
We know But pay attention to such jokes. You know, there are probably a lot of “people” here and for sure, some intelligence personnels are coming visiting those pages quite often.
No need to discuss it more, unless, we switch PM.
-
Here is a preview of what DCS is preparing:
Looking good.
-
-
The most impressive is that you can actually see the shape of the carrier on the radar display and to me the aircraft sitting on her deck. ED did a good job on that one.
-
The most impressive is that you can actually see the shape of the carrier on the radar display and to me the aircraft sitting on her deck. ED did a good job on that one.
Exactly. I guess they are relying heavily on shaders for that effect, because terrain features (i.e. countryside vs city) can be made out in the sample as well.
Regards
-
ED did a good job on that one.
Let them finish first. We have no idea what is the FPS drop linked to this feature … And this is I could be afraid in BMS either if we try one day to do the same. But I am not specialist of the question and I am just guessing.
-
Let them finish first. We have no idea what is the FPS drop linked to this feature … And this is I could be afraid in BMS either if we try one day to do the same. But I am not specialist of the question and I am just guessing.
High fidelity radar + TGP on the right side = madness! We will have to see to find out, thanks Dee-Jay!
-
Here is a preview of what DCS is preparing:
http://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=117059&d=1430413118
Looking good.
Wow. Nice!
-
Let them finish first. We have no idea what is the FPS drop linked to this feature … And this is I could be afraid in BMS either if we try one day to do the same. But I am not specialist of the question and I am just guessing.
Since it is a completely new module, it could be possible that they manage to run it asynchronous in its own thread like the sound engine does. If this is the case, that could help with performance.
-
Since it is a completely new module, it could be possible that they…
… ask for money?
Come one, was just kidding LOL …
oky, troll mode OFF. Sorry.
-
After reading this, along with the other improvement wish list threads, I think it is time we accept that the only way we will be able to meet future BMS user desired features is to infiltrate the US Military with our own people in real time to obtain the necessary data the devs need to model. No more short term solutions, we need a long range plan. May I suggest that we recruit from within:
1. Have all members identify military age family members
2. Dev’s choose best candidates and assign them to enlist in the specific service where information is desired, and volunteer for the specific job with that branch (in this case, radar technician for F-16’s, etc) where the information is needed by devs.This means updates could take a longer, 5-6 years possibly (if we start now), but man, will it be accurate! Ok, my moment of jesting is complete.
Would this not attract property right infringement considering that they are classified
-
Here is a preview of what DCS is preparing:
http://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=117059&d=1430413118
Looking good.
Just wondering, is the picture on the left the radar display of the picture on the right. Cannot make out the aircraft carrier and the airbase.
-
Just wondering, is the picture on the left the radar display of the picture on the right. Cannot make out the aircraft carrier and the airbase.
Oh yeah I see it the aircraft carrier. Had to zoom in to see it and bridge across the river on the far right.
Looking good. I guess this without the doppler sharpening effect. -
all of this. and they still cant fix. missiles
jeeez
-
all of this. and they still cant fix. missiles
You have any data that proves their FM wrong?
-
You have any data that proves their FM wrong?
Just for the 120, this is already a very good estimation that does show their FM in DCS is grossly underpowered :
http://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=104165&d=1410108839 -
Well the bone of contempt is not the motor power but the drag. Be that as it may, ED are very hesitant to spin on a dime because of a CFD analysis. Chizh is an aeronautical engineer himself with a background in CFD and he says that CFD simulation alone has too much uncertainty.