4.33 UI vs 4.33 FPS
-
I would start with the anisotropic filter .cfg line first. A 980 should be plenty to run HDR. I’ve seen reports of Nvidia having both seen improvements and hits, I think it is something in the drivers letting the ansio run crazy without this cfg line set properly in some cases.
All are sycn’d to 16x. Too much?
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
-
From another thread, might be helpful for you guys showing a hit:
]https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?26623-Reduced-fps-in-Bms-4-33-1&p=375554&viewfull=1#post375554Will try this! (also have af set to 16x or 8x via nvidia inspector, didn’t see much change). Thanks
When boresighting Mav’s (Wpn image and TGP image up on MFD’s, using in game extraction) in 4.33 I would drop to 25-30 FPS but with 4.33.1 I only drop to 50-55 FPS.
Same, but regardless of ingame extraction (or mfde). Seems like tgp drops me ~10 fps, and mav uncaged ~10fps (both on screen, minus ~20fps unscientific)
(2x 780 ti)
-
I am using 2 x 680s. With 4.33 i was balls to the walls as well. i used to get run 50-60 with vsyn holding me down at 60fps. i now get 30s - 50fps with stutter. If i go external view i jump up to 90-120. It seems to be in cockpit where i am seeing the biggest difference.
Just FYI,
SLi and Xfire are not supported in bms. When I have Xfire enabled, the load up screen freezes. If I manage to get into pit, it has bad stuttering. Disable SLi or Xfire until bms supports it.
-
no doubt!!! 4.33.1 has much better performance
-
Disable SLi or Xfire until bms supports it.
I’ll continue to fight you on this jhook
Afr2 sli works for me with performance improvements -
I’ll continue to fight you on this jhook
Afr2 sli works for me with performance improvementsNo need to fight. There are several threads on this subject.
There are others that detail how SLi/Xfire have issues. Maybe 4.331 has better support for SLi/Xfire. Don’t know as I would have to test that. Been REAL BUSY as of late. Only downloaded 4.331 I have yet to install and set up. Perhaps a dev can chime in on the latest version and SLi/Xfire for 4.331
-
In general, neither is supposed to improve with anything DX9. IIRC Viral, you run multiple monitors which may be the exception.
-
In general, neither is supposed to improve with anything DX9. IIRC Viral, you run multiple monitors which may be the exception.
True. In the thread I posted, we discussed that same set up. Disabling SLi/Xfire but using multi monitors through multiple cards got several guys up and running well.
-
-
True. In the thread I posted, we discussed that same set up. Disabling SLi/Xfire but using multi monitors through multiple cards got several guys up and running well.
It worked good for my 3 monitor setup in 4.33. The new 4.33 U1 cant say yet for sure except I have some issues,
-
For those having an FPS drop, check that your GPU clock is not stuck in power saving mode.
I run a triple screen setup with two 780s and Max performance GPU modr was not kicking in on one of the cards.
That can have multiple causes, for example the default 3d profile has adaptive power mode enabled and we have not created an specific profile for the new U1 .exe file.
That was mi case. I created a new profile with nvidia inspector for the new U1 exe and changed the default adaptive power mode to maximum performance and adjust the rest of parameters accordingly as they were for 4.33.
Now everything works as it should.
Enviado desde mi HUAWEI Y530-U00 mediante Tapatalk
-
I would also point out that it seems like the only reports of frame rate hits seem to have been on Nvidia cards. I have an AMD and have seen an increase, also several Nvidia guys have seen an increase as well. I really think this is something with Nvidia configuration or even driver versions.
-
I would also point out that it seems like the only reports of frame rate hits seem to have been on Nvidia cards. I have an AMD and have seen an increase, also several Nvidia guys have seen an increase as well. I really think this is something with Nvidia configuration or even driver versions.
I agree.
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
-
My results on Nvidia GTX770 is the following (vertex lighting, no HDR, no fancy water or raindrops):
4.33 - 59 FPS
4.33.U1 - 89 FPSHUGE IMPRVEMENT! Many thanks, BMS team!!!
-
For me it’s so and so … but seems more fluid.
-
Confirmed - definite 30% improvement for 4.33.1 on Intel Core i5 2500K (O/C to 4.2GHz); ASUS P8Z68-V LX; 8GB DDR3; AMD R9 380; Windows 7 64 bit, using same configuration as 4.33 - yet to try switching on more goodies. Currently achieving smooth 25-35 FPS on AGM-65 Training TE with TGP and MAV WPN extracted with MFDE onto 2x 7" LCD which I am v happy with!
-
With everything maxxed out in BMS and all graphics options on in BMS and no driver options on. Looks gorgeous and flies smooth as silk.
70-80 FPS on AGM-65 Training TE with TGP and MAV WPN. Vsync on (for tearing) and NEVER goes below 60 fps even on crowded airbases, or over FLOT.
Intel Core i7 3930K (O/C to 4.5GHz), GTX 980ti SC, 32GB DDR4,Windows 7 64 bit
Nice work BMS!!! -
Tweaking has not fixed the fps hit for me. I once ran 3 monitors at 60-80fps its down to 40-50 on the harm training TE. On the AGM-65 Training TE in 4.33 I would get 40-50s now 20-30fps. Big change in the wrong direction for me but going to make it work somehow.
-
With everything maxxed out in BMS and all graphics options on in BMS and no driver options on. Looks gorgeous and flies smooth as silk.
70-80 FPS on AGM-65 Training TE with TGP and MAV WPN. Vsync on (for tearing) and NEVER goes below 60 fps even on crowded airbases, or over FLOT.
Intel Core i7 3930K (O/C to 4.5GHz), GTX 980ti SC, 32GB DDR4,Windows 7 64 bit
Nice work BMS!!!What other settings are on in BMS?
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
-
Looks like I got It close to where it was in 4.33. I used some of the setting found here http://s51.photobucket.com/user/cptpfsuk7/media/afrrrr_zpsc04e92c5.png.html hopefully this can help some one else.
All is good again!