Update v1.0.5 for Balkans 4.33.1c1
-
I just checked out Aviano AB, the voiceover sounds very good.
All the best, Uwe
-
I’m going to try to release more airbases that Nove has done on the next update. That will be one of the top ones
Thanks a lot, our Group will pay you a nice dinner on a good restaurant in Rimini!
-
Thanks a lot Cougar & CO.
Please , when will be available the update Cervia AB… after summer holidays of course…;)Well “nove” works hard in order to offer us more great airbases.
Right now he is taking care of Sigonella airbase. After it the next target is the beautiful Cervia airbase that was a real home of italian F-16s block 15 ADF.
Nikos. -
Thanks a lot, our Group will pay you a nice dinner on a good restaurant in Rimini!
Hey, that isn’t fair…
What about “nove” and myself? :mrgreen:
Nikos. -
Another time but I have not other words
Congratulations
Cheers
-
Hey, that isn’t fair…
What about “nove” and myself? :mrgreen:
Nikos.We would like to meet all of you and in that occasion no one will be without feet under the table…
-
We would like to meet all of you and in that occasion no one will be without feet under the table…
I think that you see that it was ONLY a nice joke, right?
Thanks for the kindly offer by the way, and enjoy the new goodies of Balkans.
Nikos. -
I think that you see that it was ONLY a nice joke, right?
Thanks for the kindly offer by the way, and enjoy the new goodies of Balkans.
Nikos.The beer’s on me if we ever meet in RL. :bdance:
All the best, Uwe
-
I know it was a joke … but considering the great fun and joy for anyone from AMVI which can participate at our yearly LAN Party, usually at Rimini, it could be an opportunity too.
Very kind regards -
Hi guys.
Firstly thanks for updateBut after updated Balkans
falcon bms corrapted and stop workingI need help
Thanks
-
You might have to do a reinstall of bms. Did you follow the instructions in the readme file?
-
You might have to do a reinstall of bms. Did you follow the instructions in the readme file?
Yes. Is there any suggestion
-
Nikos, my friend…
Well done for new stations+ils … nicely organized, names updated etc … Thank You
I am tryin’ to print that list up once for all … but not yet I’m afraidBut, that’s about 15th time it was updated, and now, dude, you’ve forgot dozens uhf radio’s (0), mission commander is ‘all in red’ , I can see Greece has all uhf. Good homework
No really, was that by design or mistake? Will that have other impact(s) then using VHF only ? (remember, only uhf radio has backup in falcon)
Regards
WFedit: nvm, figured it out, it will be updated soon , again , atc callsigns etc… well…
-
I f… love this theater! Great job!!! thx!!!
-
Thank you for this beautiful theater, outstanding!!!
-
Nikos, my friend…
Well done for new stations+ils … nicely organized, names updated etc … Thank You
I am tryin’ to print that list up once for all … but not yet I’m afraidBut, that’s about 15th time it was updated, and now, dude, you’ve forgot dozens uhf radio’s (0), mission commander is ‘all in red’ , I can see Greece has all uhf. Good homework
No really, was that by design or mistake? Will that have other impact(s) then using VHF only ? (remember, only uhf radio has backup in falcon)
Regards
WFedit: nvm, figured it out, it will be updated soon , again , atc callsigns etc… well…
First of all I personally don’t know if this is the 15th time that the Balkans NavAids updated. The previous version was by Red Dog and it was very close to 15 September 2011 (or a little earlier, not later for sure).
For that date, he made a great work. Now after 5 years I wanted to update them and make them current, as also to correct some small issues that I did.
Second you state that I forgot dozens of ATC UHF frequencies. Of course you like to guess, estimate and in general to base your opinion to non real perfect current data.
Stop doing that, because maybe you don’t realize it, you are directly offend to my work with "and now, dude, you’ve forgot dozens uhf radio’s "! It takes a lot to collect ALL the real (especially military) data, to analyze them, to find any duplicates for avoiding conflicts due to BMS code limitation and to finally place them in the list as also in the “stations+ils.dat” file and give them to the BMS users, without to make mistakes!
You very easily judge the work by a guy that spends a lot of time in order to provide perfect and super real data in these nav. stuff and has NO complains for them by years!
And very bad the statement that I provide for Greece (my country) all the airports with ATC UHF. Of course you like to guess and estimate, so you don’t/can’t find the real stuff to see that actually they have!
By the way, learn that almost all the airports in Greece has also an ATC UHF frequency!
And your guess that the Balkans NavAids will updated soon is of course out of real status. They don’t need to change something because they are perfect!
Last the ATC callsigns are not my job, neither was in the previous version. If my friend “cougar56th” need my help for that, then of course it will be my business.Nikos.
-
Nikos, would I call you a friend if I wanted to insult you ?
Apologies, You misunderstood me. I didn’t try to offend You or any of your work, that actually have to be done in due time…. Maybe my english is just not on the brightest side.
"and now, dude, you’ve forgot dozens uhf radio’s " - meant , how haven’t you noticed that error , or was it intentional, I’ve put a lot questions marks , that was all a part of question…
We don’t know what are you doing if you don’t tell us … I was just simply surprised.
And, I was tried to be a bit sarcastic, but on the bright side, ya’know, shit happens, haha, big deal…But the real reason that interests me here is, why we must first destroy all data then rebuild it from scratch, in my opinion that is wrong in this case.
Why tear it down? We can leave it as is, then update it with current data when that data becomes available. One by one, update case, is just a bit too excessive to adapt.
I know that data is hard to find, possibility is that for some we never gonna be able to find it… but then why deleting old values?, C’mon . Does it have to be 150% realistic, or at least just useful?Please don’t be offended just for constructive criticism, it was never meant to be rude and offensive, ok, maybe sarcastic sneeky , but not like ’ in your face dude’ , I do actually very very respect your work , and you’ve done a lot more then most of us, especially with NavAids, So what if you ****edup , who didn’t ? is it beyond repair?, No.
And Please, You don’t take things like meaning they are getto racisist , … omfg , whole ****ing world is coming like this and i think it is popular but is very sick… and dear God is just looking down at us and think , gonna squash some beetles soon…Please accept my apologies again for any insult taken, it was not meant to be like this,… I thought You just needed a little push more towards people and not machines We re human afterall and we rule machines and not vice versa, agreed?
Cheers
WF -
Nikos, would I call you a friend if I wanted to insult you ?
Apologies, You misunderstood me. I didn’t try to offend You or any of your work, that actually have to be done in due time…. Maybe my english is just not on the brightest side.
"and now, dude, you’ve forgot dozens uhf radio’s " - meant , how haven’t you noticed that error , or was it intentional, I’ve put a lot questions marks , that was all a part of question…
We don’t know what are you doing if you don’t tell us … I was just simply surprised.
And, I was tried to be a bit sarcastic, but on the bright side, ya’know, shit happens, haha, big deal…But the real reason that interests me here is, why we must first destroy all data then rebuild it from scratch, in my opinion that is wrong in this case.
Why tear it down? We can leave it as is, then update it with current data when that data becomes available. One by one, update case, is just a bit too excessive to adapt.
I know that data is hard to find, possibility is that for some we never gonna be able to find it… but then why deleting old values?, C’mon . Does it have to be 150% realistic, or at least just useful?Please don’t be offended just for constructive criticism, it was never meant to be rude and offensive, ok, maybe sarcastic sneeky , but not like ’ in your face dude’ , I do actually very very respect your work , and you’ve done a lot more then most of us, especially with NavAids, So what if you ****edup , who didn’t ? is it beyond repair?, No.
And Please, You don’t take things like meaning they are getto racisist , … omfg , whole ****ing world is coming like this and i think it is popular but is very sick… and dear God is just looking down at us and think , gonna squash some beetles soon…Please accept my apologies again for any insult taken, it was not meant to be like this,… I thought You just needed a little push more towards people and not machines We re human afterall and we rule machines and not vice versa, agreed?
Cheers
WFYou continue to state for a sector that really you are far away of the basics.
In the one side you post complains about the “0” UHF frequencies, and now you state that it is o.k. and why I made them from scratch?
What’s wrong with you? You think that your opinion reflects the opinion by all the other members (myself included of course) here that always ask for more and more realism and perfection?
And when a guy offer that to them, now you came to say it is a wrong action? Maybe to think again with a “cold” mine what exactly you posted.
Now you post this “We don’t know what are you doing if you don’t tell us … I was just simply surprised.”
Who do you think you are that I must give explanations about my work to? I’m an external independent specific Falcon developer that with love and dedication offer to this community my work and I don’t need to give explanations to anyone, and especially to you with that behavior!
And yes, of course and you were offending, very clearly!
If I was you, that you don’t know anything of Falcon BMS NavAids and how they actually work into the sim, then I was post something like this:
“Nikos, is there something wrong with the “0” UHF frequencies?” This is the correct polite behavior that leaves no room for “misunderstandings” like you want to cover it, and not with the "dude, you’ve forgot dozens uhf radio’s ".
And why you mention for Greek airports that all have a UHF frequency (that actually have) with the ironic "Good homework "? Again because you wanted to ask polite? Obviously not, just to leave the meaning of a not fair providing data since the greek airports have all a UHF frequency. Because that was the way you were wanted to see, and not to simply ask me with a polite tone!Last I always welcome and accept any criticism, WHEN it is correct and based to the real status!
Anyway, I will welcome you to create your NavAids and their list with your correct and great method, in order to we all the rest see how you can do them. And of course I will be the first one to spot the REAL issues there, but at least with a polite behavior that I always follow.
That is our main difference…Nikos.
-
This post is deleted! -
white fang, keep it civil