Flew straight and level
-
no change in altitude had it on auto pilot every 5 miles past altitude should had increased
Your ADI is referenced to local vertical (if you ever knew what local vertical means)…
Its not Apollo FDAI that can be aligned to anything.
ADI is aligned to horizon, so it keeps flying with respect to horizon. Much like Apollo orbit rate manouver.And there is Flightsim for Apollo. In therms of realism it kills BMS and DCS like they were ducks… Sorry BMS team…
Maybe in something like 40 years we will have true MMC emulation (not simulation) in BMS running actual software like we have AGC emulation in NASSP that runs the same binaries that were used by Apollo astronauts
Realistic to the bit(ch), realistic to the switch
The best thing?
Its free!
Its addon for orbiter sim. Both orbiter sim and NASSP are freeware. And NASSP is open source.
Get it here: http://nassp.sourceforge.net/
And you gonna realize that all the learning hell you came trough just to fly BMS was just a piece of cake.
BMS = weeks of learning.
NASSP = years of learning and you still failSorry for offtop. But this thread is just a big offtop so i couldn’t resist to troll this guy with things that are sooooo technical…
…I know that guy who don’t knows how ADI works will never understand AGC, but i couldn’t resist…
Forgive me this little spam…
…And first of all don’t take it too serious! -
Or, BMS once again is simply unusually realistic in it’s design.
-
Sorry Agave_Blue I couldn’t manage to watch all 30 odd minutes … I got a hard to resist urge to beat my head against a brick wall to try to knock the Ball Earth theory from my obviously confused mind.
:dhorse: :uham: -
“Yes the government is dosing the public with boner pills”
Now that is FUNNY!
-
LOL, I wonder how this thread came about??!!
-
that’s right
-
��������
-
that’s right it’s flat and motionless
-
“Yes the government is dosing the public with boner pills”
Now that is FUNNY!
They also spray us with those contrails. Contantly.
Lets not forget this.
It aint just luck that above bigger cities more airplane pass.
Its just to make sure to spray all…
Wake up… the end is near.
Hold umbrellas, wear breathing masks with bio filters, cover your whole skin area when outside, install filters on the airways in your house and work, grow your own food. Dont walk too far u might fall.
[emoji38]sent from my mi5 using Tapatalk
-
no change in altitude had it on auto pilot every 5 miles past altitude should had increased
autopilot does/does not maintain altitude?
-
AP has 3 vertical modes.
It can maintain ATTitude or ALTitiude, it also has ADVanced mode for cooperation with TFR.
In ALT hold it simply maintains barometric altitude.
In ATT hold (pitch hold) it maintain attitude. Attitude in F-16 is aligned to horizon, much like in any other aircraft. This is why ADI is so called “artificial horizon”. Its not “stellar inertial” like in Apollo FDAI.
In ADV mode its more complicated, it may follow terrain profile, it may be also set into blended mode to provide flyups when ground approaches too close. In blended mode autopilot will hold ATT or (baro) ALT (depending on the switch) and when ground approaches too close TFR will takeover. -
if one seeks hard enough he finds an information weapon of mass destruction in the civilian education of an enlisted officer of the navy, having attended northwestern university in the limelight of the age of the internet, he has weaponized trolling.
flat earth is the result of one student’s theory in sociology being applied to computer science and advanced social engineering. It was a litmus test, most people failed.
-
Level flight is not straight-line flight anyway. It’s primarily why HARS systems have a latitude dial.
-
I can tell you this I maintain 25k ft just about the whole mission. ijs on a ball earth that’s impossible
-
Level flight on a sphere is a curved path.
-
ijs on a ball earth that’s impossible
??? If the autopilot keeps you at the same altitude, then yes, you will still be at 25k relative to air pressure 29.92.
-
I can tell you this I maintain 25k ft just about the whole mission. ijs on a ball earth that’s impossible
Well, no, its not.
Yes, you are correct, BMS is a flat earth. No, you havent proved that. Your experiment is NOT how you prove a flat earth. You have proved that the autopilot is capable of keeping a level altitude, which is the behavior of the real aircraft. Your experiment is reproducible in the real aircraft, on a curved earth.
You prove flat BMS by flying parallel flight paths at different latitudes and noting distance covered is identical rather than varying by latitude.
You can go do that experiment if you like, but its known rather than suspected - you will just be another data point in what is considered a closed solution-space already.
-
Blu’s right of course. You could do the same experiment in FSX and come to the same conclusion. Does BMS do anything regarding spherical planet? Radio horizon, star placement, anything?
-
Blu’s right of course. You could do the same experiment in FSX and come to the same conclusion. Does BMS do anything regarding spherical planet? Radio horizon, star placement, anything?
Radio horizon is implemented for IVC - although I recall some debate as to how accurate it is for some platforms, with complaints regarding inability to hear AWACS unless flying formation with them.
-
Haven’t you studied that the Earth is a flat table on the shell of the turtle?