Why the Falcon 4 Engine needs help!
-
Hehe Me trully think that DJ is talking way too much trying to be informative (based on its own individual comprehension of the direction we are visibly taking inside the team) and should remains tight lips like many other devs, considering that BMS has no communicationâs policies and no official voice. (Furthermore, I take the risks to have the legs broken by my own team mates lol).
So I guess that Red Dog got a good point here (I am not talking about the fact that thrust vectoring has nothings to deal with radar or avionics so to say) : Rather than giving from time to time few words about what is not to be expected since we canât advertise on what is to be expected in the future because it is against BMS traditional common practice, I âshouldâ better say nothing at all. At ⌠all. Dam! He is so right after all! I mean ⌠When people donât like to be told what they donât want to hear, the best is certainly to let them dream. Then after, good surprise, or less good surprise, after all, who really cares? It is free. There are no customers here.
Have a Falcon day gents.
Amen mate.
As a moderator i must enforce the forum rules, and one of this rule is that BMS dev doesnât talk or show pictures about ongoing development, and indeed my moderator feeling is that too many dev talk way too much in here.
It is tolerated somehow, but the added traffic we see lately is starting to get confusing because of lack of common strategy and this is exactly what i wanted to bring with my striking remark before it gets out of handI thank you for your understanding and i hope your usual friends will undertand as well
-
@Red:
Amen mate.
As a moderator i must enforce the forum rules, and one of this rule is that BMS dev doesnât talk or show pictures about ongoing developmentI donât see anything in the forum rules that states that??? Please direct!!
C9
-
None of your concern mate, unless youâre a dev
-
The strategy of BMS is very clear though
The strategy is to not have a strategy
People are free to work on what they like provided that this is done with quality and fidelity
-
Whatâs the nextâŚ!
That is not always a good question. Some could mean, that what we have isnât good enough no longerâŚ, maybe even boring. But that is for sure not an issue from the mod!
But also can this question raise an incentive. But, and IMO, only, if it comes here and there, and rare.
As I began with BMS, I jumped into a cold water, and it pleased me (only two: head tracking, clickable cockpit), what I can do with the modâŚ, only flying at that time!
To me, there is still not such a question, âWhat comes next?â.
As long as the devs are developing, there is coming new, or better, that is for sure.That is to me still that cold water, that I love, even when I still would have questions (to the devs).
So, dear devs, hurry up! The next release is in three, four weeks! Iâm curiousâŚ
Ah, and âThis old engineâŚâ:
If you have a truck engine, it is a truck engine. If you have a racing engine, it is a racing engine. If you have a F-16 engine, it is a F-16 engine. A.s.oâŚFor sure has this engine its limits. But, this engine needs no help! There are still times, where I âwonderâ how stable the sim (still) is.
All it needs, is to know how to handle this engine, and/or to have the ability to implement (e.g. source code).
All the ârestâ is love, time, powerâŚMy (single) 2c, and with best regards
Earlybite -
The strategy of BMS is very clear though
The strategy is to not have a strategy
People are free to work on what they like provided that this is done with quality and fidelity
We love when NO plans comes together
-
I just want to fly the 16 in VRâŚ. please? Pretty please?? Lol
That would need DirectX 11 first so not gonna happen anytime soon.
-
Wait⌠the biggest problem with bms is that it doesnât have an F-35? lmfao
Can we just stick to improving 80âs/90âs f-16 and campaign.
There are plenty of things left to do. Can the SAM operators behave more intelligently like in Allied Force? Can Buk and SA-10 shoot down HARMs and glide bombs? Why donât people ask for these kinds of featuresâŚIntelligent and devious SAM operators sounds like a great idea!
-
@Cloud:
Oh no, no. BMS is TOP SECRET SQUIRREL STUFF!!! No can do!!!
C9
once you cross the squirrels and OPSEC labels you a Doolittle, itâs all over.
CHIRP CHIRP
-
Its a down hill slide, :boxing:
All I want is a 2560x1440 UI, and my two front teeth . so I can again :second:
-
Its a down hill slide, :boxing:
All I want is a 2560x1440 UI, and my two front teeth . so I can again :second:
that could be a âOi santa claus you ****â moment for xmas
-
@Switch:
That would need DirectX 11 first so not gonna happen anytime soon.
But, If i take a trackir, The i take a vr and i use the cable of my screen? Shouldnât be that kindoff a VR?