FALCON BMS 4.34 - New Tutorial videos
-
Dear sir:
good job ,thank you for your video .
Can you teach US how to set kneeborad in bms 4.34 release ,i will appreciate that.The kneboard of the 3d pit I undestand, right? how to make a custom texture to get the info that you want in the kneboard
Good video proposal, I will do it for sure, thanks for the idea
-
You get the kneeboard with ALT + c : p (toggle pilot model)
-
COMO HACER UN PATRON DE ATERRIZJAE CON LA IA Y COMUNICACIONES DEL ATC PARA ATERRIZAR
HOW TO PERFORM A OVERHEAD PATTERN WITH THE IA AND ATC LANDING COMMS
-
How to perform a overhead with the IA in the carrier landing and HOW TO PROPER GET THE LSO / PADDELS CALLS
Do not forget to suscribe it is freeENGLISH VERSION
I have to say taht this time a get many times the feeling of "I don´t know how to say this… "
SPANISH VERSION
-
I skimmed through the video to free up time for other priorities, but watching that really brings back memories of playing Hornet way too often back in my youth. One of my occaisional problems, which I must assume is also one of yours, was listening too intently to the computer LSO. I believe the disconnect here is that the sim pilot believes the computer LSO is going to bring the plane in appropriately by just responding to the directives, when the truth is that the sim pilot must also be aware of the appropriate procedure. Only when those two things are in concert will the computer LSO actually help you land the plane. If you intend to land the simulated aircraft by feel alone, there’s not much value in the computer LSO, and like you did, you just don’t call the ball or otherwise ignore the calls, seemingly doing better as a result.
To be a little more constructive, I play with naval operations in X-Plane 8 from time to time, attempting to make the best out of what I have available. I currently practice approaches according to this fine presentation that was highlighted by TheDrive almost a year ago:
…The approach method detailed in the first video is generally very agnostic to the aircraft you’re flying. Most of the time, I’m dinking around with an F9F-8 Cougar, and said approach pattern works wonderfully if you’re on your toes. What you see is that the flight pattern around the carrier is VERY tight and VERY short. The termination and start of your turns basically begin and end at the front and back of the ship! Your final turn takes you from 600ft AGL to less than half of that altitude and then straight onto the deck afterwards. To demonstrate how confined and contained these clear weather approaches really are, refer to the following video featuring A-6s from the good 'ole 90’s:
Watching your flight, it looks like you were really strung out too far away from the ship. It seems strange to complain about that aspect, because one would think having more time to make the approach would make things easier… but I don’t think it really does. Instead, you just burn more fuel and have to spend more time getting into an appropriate approach window. The latter factor is what is going to increase the difficulty factor. If you watch the other videos in the presentation, you will see that another key thing you want to do is hold the aircraft on-speed with respect to the AOA indexer (granted, I’m not sure the BMS AOA indexer is quite right for the Hornet), and control your decent with thrust alone. Actual airspeed is not much of a concern once the aircraft is flying dirty in the pattern, as you must also remain in said pattern - this will keep things under control quite naturally.
Thanks for the video - naval aviation is still my favorite!
-
The AoA indexers and brackets are accurate for the f18
So is the trim that controls the Aoa in full flaps
Autothrottle is also modeled (both in cruise (speed control) and land (AOA control)
With the f18 you don’t play with thrust whe autothrottle is engaged
You trim you ac to be on the right Aoa , engage autothrottle and use then stick to adjust
F18 FM is totally different from f16 in BMS.
t has a totally dedicated FLCS , dedicated Flaps behaviors, dedicated throttle logic
-
F18 FM is totally different form f16 in BMS. It has a totally dedicated FLCS
And also a documentation for this new FM (including performance charts, Fuel-Flow/endurance/rage data and limitors)
-
Tried to find some information about using autothrottle while on carrier final, but did not see that verbatum. Found a good deal of material on ACLS, though that’s a bit out of scope. I’ll keep my eyes open for said material on using autothrottle for the approach…
…For what it’s worth, that concept is rather new to me, and most of the material I have read or seen does not mention the autothrottle being used for this application!
-
One more Week one more english tutorial
Do not forget to suscribe if you want to see more of this
Thanks for the coments
-
Thank you “Rev”;)
You’ve been helpful! -
UFC IFF button tutorial and IFF options
(this video comes with english subtiteles)
Do not forget to activate the subtiteles, and also check my whole playlists of the ICP tutorials -
one more wednesday one more bms tutorial and I hope a bunch of new suscribers in my Channels, CHEERS!!
English version:
Spanish Version:
-
Spanish version:
-
-
Errr is it me or the bullseye contacts from the picture call are not the ones you saw?
The numbers on your fcr don’t match the ones on the radio calls. Maybe you had more aircraft coming in and where you pointed your radar was elsewhere? Or the difference comes cause you where on 80 miles range and a slide move of the radar cursor gives much difference on the bullseye?Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T818A using Tapatalk
-
Errr is it me or the bullseye contacts from the picture call are not the ones you saw?
The numbers on your fcr don’t match the ones on the radio calls. Maybe you had more aircraft coming in and where you pointed your radar was elsewhere? Or the difference comes cause you where on 80 miles range and a slide move of the radar cursor gives much difference on the bullseye?Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T818A using Tapatalk
The mision was hand made by me, the onlu contact in the mission what those ones
And yes, the further the cursor is from the down part of the radar, the bigger the difference is in range and azimut with small movements, remember that the F16 radar is rerpesented like a square, but the real area of coverage is a triangle (looking frome adove)How to perform a Cobra
Spanish version
-
RESOURCES FILES, MOD YOUR OWN UI
Spanish
English
-
F16 Ramp Start
Spanish Version
English Version
-
F16 Ramp Start
Spanish Version
English Version
Would be interesting to have similar video for F18 Ramp Start
-
The AoA indexers and brackets are accurate for the f18
So is the trim that controls the Aoa in full flaps
Autothrottle is also modeled (both in cruise (speed control) and land (AOA control)
With the f18 you don’t play with thrust whe autothrottle is engaged
You trim you ac to be on the right Aoa , engage autothrottle and use then stick to adjust
F18 FM is totally different from f16 in BMS.
t has a totally dedicated FLCS , dedicated Flaps behaviors, dedicated throttle logic
Is trim control also modeled in take offs in 434?
Like in f18 manual where you must set trim controls to correct position on take off to override flight computer and get full movements of elevator.