It happened often
-
@AviationPlus : I refer 4.37 from your video… It is so cool with a lot of new feature… I see it from your channel tho
-
4.35 is soooooooooo far away!
There won’t be many answers as we moved on for a while now…
-
@MaxWaldorf I know max, I am just curious, a lot of my friends still play the 4.35 tbh. But as long as we enjoy it, it’s great. They like it tho. Btw, about the energy that I mentioned before, he’s using 4.37. Overall, y’all doing it great… I post this as an appreciation for all of you guys
-
4.36 and 4.37 have included so many AI improvements that we can’t reply to your questions
-
@Mav-jp it is okay mav, really appreciate… btw, I have 4.36. It is the first one that I play before move on into 4.35. Almost half year if I remember correctly play with 4.36. I still remember tho, the HMCS need to be aligned. That’s one of the difference in 4.36.
-
@GP1508 said in It happened often:
I am just curious, a lot of my friends still play the 4.35 tbh
May I ask, what’s the reason? I think most of us have experienced performance improvements in 4.37, compared to 4.36, 4.35.
I think the minimum system / OS requirements are unchanged, since then. (4.34 was DX9 so that, I would understand)
Maybe I’m mistaken, or misremembering… oh, did 4.35 still support 32-bit OS? I can’t remember when BMS went 64-bit only.
-
@GP1508 said in It happened often:
@Mav-jp it is okay mav, really appreciate… btw, I have 4.36. It is the first one that I play before move on into 4.35. Almost half year if I remember correctly play with 4.36. I still remember tho, the HMCS need to be aligned. That’s one of the difference in 4.36.
It’s a tiny difference in the list.
-
@airtex2019 ummm, 4.35 is the one that playable. Not because the 64bit, or 32bit, but 4.35 is the one that playable in our country and area. For latest computer, of course 4.37 is better, for somehow, a lot more people, living and have fun using 10years old PC. You guys, really made it great.
Most of them that play with old PC here is real Fighting Falcon Pilot. They already retired right now. So yeah, you boys made them have toy again, even it just 4.35 that obsolete. Just a reminder to me also, something that looks obsolete in our view, somehow can be very precious in the life of other people.
-
@GP1508 ok, if you’ve tested both, I believe you… just want to make sure you guys aren’t holding onto an assumption that newer == slower.
that is often true with games … and probably will be true for BMS 4.38 … but as of 4.37, the devs have made countless bug fixes and perf improvements, over the past 2 years. did they do something that optimizes the build for newer gen CPUs? maybe, I dunno… it is entirely possible.
-
@airtex2019 no sir, some of us already try. It’s not the bug, it is the hardware limitation that prevent us to have fun with 4.37. I do post here not for complaining, but to give credit to all of you that bring happiness to us. You guys really make a bold statement with Falcon BMS. Cheers…
-
Your computer specs that won’t run 4.37?
-
@Icarus in the video, I7 2nd gen, 8GbRam, no SSD, 4.5Gb old graphic card. It is the CPU I bought at 2013… To made 4.35 play smooth, I restrict the Sim to render more than the limit FPS. Mostly stutter happened at ground operation if, I do not limit the FPS. The benchmark TE is not as harsh at the campaign actually, but if my setup failed there, mostly will got a problem at campaign. Also notice that using high quality textures is more free from stutter. Right now I can push the AA value 2 in BMS and enhanced into 8 in Nvidia with a reshade run, and obs record at background. Previously I can’t record while play with obs, until I use x264 custom command there.
I use reshade to color correct the blue, white, and green, so the blue is blue, white in cloud is more white, and green do not tend to yellow. I did use reshade to replace the hdr bloom from the game. The hard part is correct the green, so that it not tend to be yellow.
This one year journey with Falcon BMS is more about get the comfort one with limited resource. I do play a lot with it, maybe 6-8hours a day outside my regular job as a local podcast host. A bit late actually met the falcon bms, too late I guess, cause things can be different if I knew it sooner.
Just keep going boys, keep deliver the falcon, I’ll catch up with you step by step.
-
@GP1508 ok, a BMS dev would have to confirm, but I do think I heard they’re using AVX2 instruction set, which was added to Intel chips starting with Haswell (4th gen) chips.
and if you don’t have it, I believe it falls back to a slower software-emulation path.
now, that doesn’t explain why 4.37 would be slower than 4.35 which obvs also doesn’t make use of AVX2… just explains why it might not be faster.
but, there have been other changes… eg. the threading-model … making use of more CPU cores. it’s still ok for most 4-core CPUs, but maybe not ok if you’re recording with OBS and also have head-tracking software running … and I have no idea what ReShade is doing
-
@airtex2019 reshade is kinda like an overlay and an injector, so it does eat up cpu
-
@okayasugf it is eat cpu, but compared with the hdr bloom from the BMS itself, fakehdr from reshade do more way more effective in term of CPU usage and richness of the bloom. I put fakehdr after colourfulness, so the bloom is just like the video. After fakehdr, I do simple color correction, I forgot the filter, but I color correct the green. I get ripped off the yellowish thing in green color.
The capture itself a bit tricky, cause this is the part between bandwith in term “live stream”, speed, and power resources. I use vbr instead of the common recommended CBR with sort of parameter. Since my network although able up to 20Mbps, in reality, above 5Mbps will be delivered with multiple ping spike, thus I have extra homework here. And this the parameter I might share with you all, VBR with CRF value 15, 5000 bitrate, superfast, high profile, and tune for grain. Is that it? No, here is the next part, I put this value at x264 option, separated by space ;
bframes=2 b-adapt=0 partitions=none scenecut=0 no-weightb weightp=0 sliced-threads aq-mode=0 subme=0 trellis=1
Note, if you have enough processing power, go ahead with change at ;
aq-mode=2 and subme=6
I usually use this kind of parameter with aq-mode 2 and subme 6 in TE. In campaign, mine hit the limit at the airbase, especially when I create such a massive sync launch, let said 20 jet conducting sync attack at one spesific area, instead of the campaign engine did in a manner random frag. I put all KF and all korean things into campaign engine and create my own at all US flag jet / nato jet. Doing ramp start with this kind of aqmode and subme parameter is pain for mine if I frag the mission by myself at such large operation at once. But this is the beauty of BMS, the more but very limited chessboard flight combat simulator. This is why I fall in with BMS, the map, and the fact I can strategically made my own decision at the campaign, just like the old game I once play called JSF.
-
@airtex2019 I do turn off the hyperthreading also for BMS, it smoother. The reshade I use is for my pref only about color. FakeHDR from reshade after colourfulness bring vibrant modern tone color, while after those two, I ripped off the yellowish tone at the green terrain. Without reshade is ok also. I limit the FPS sir, for sure that’s what made the BMS playable for me at the campaign. I am once again not complain here, instead this might give all you a clue and insight to kept delivered in such elevated way. For now, I manage to pull the BMS even 4.35 with reshade, obs record with certain set parameter. If you don’t mind, a have a few footage since I start my first journey with 4.36, then moved into 4.35. I’ll drop my IG and Tiktok account dedicated for it later.
Tbh, at my eyes, I can see the change through color profile difference.
About limit the FPS, I use RivaTuner. Even the FPS counter in bms showed 90FPS, the rendered counter in bms will stay with a number of FPS that I limit. No Vsync or triplebuffer, to get rid tearing, I play it in windowed mode. At least now, it is playable and I can enjoy rewatch my record and have fun, that’s my goal and already achieved. Next is catch up with all of you, like “HOTAS”, more powerful and latest tech PC and so on. Geez, I turn on my old PC, repaste and made it work again after I found about BMS in somebody channel that compared BMS with DCS in term of flight characteristic. BMS remind me with JSF in term of the map.
-
@GP1508 Still pretty weird 4.35 is faster than 4.37. I bought my computer in 2012 and I get nearly the double the fps in 4.37 vs 4.35.
-
@Icarus Same here 4.37 gives me more fps on my old machine.
EDIT: Haven`t tried the campaign in 4.37 though. -
@Roger For me same thing in campaign double fps.
-
@Icarus what CPU, Icarus ?