Iff you could have one thing in the next update it would be. (Archive)
-
at this point just the beta of the update would be fine!
= means : I do not care about bugs, CTDs etc …
So … since a Beta is enough for you … once te 4.33 will be released, you wont have the right to report or complain about anything (any version is a sort of Btest version anyway).
-
Since this is a wish thread:
More sensible campaign logic and AI mission control. Or integrated air defence with some sense: ambushes and tracks sharing. -
= means : I do not care about bugs, CTDs etc …
So … since a Beta is enough for you … once te 4.33 will be released, you wont have the right to report or complain about anything (any version is a sort of Btest version anyway).
Cheers,
LS -
As I know wheather, clouds and daytime has 0 effect on AI eyeball and well as on your padlock excep the Sun’s blinding effect. Weather also does not have any effect on LOS check MAV/TGP as I can remember.
this is a change then, I recall distinctly reading about the range and change of detection of the Mk 1 eyeball in day vs night in one of the old manuals - RP5 maybe?
-
this is a change then, I recall distinctly reading about the range and change of detection of the Mk 1 eyeball in day vs night in one of the old manuals - RP5 maybe?
Yep, in RP5.
But this is just falcon thing, some nice things get lost when new mod is out
-
how about lakes and rivers that don’t run over mountainsides lol?
-
how about lakes and rivers that don’t run over mountainsides lol?
I would seriously be happy even if that were the only terrain improvement.
-
I posted this in another thread, but here’s where I believe it belongs:
"I don’t have any special wishes regarding the changes / amendments to appear in the next version of our sim, I’d rather rely on the expertise of its current devs and modders, I’ll risk some (un)educated guesses, though We’ll probably see new KTO terrain, something resembling Tom’s HighTiles for Korea, just polished and perfected. Most likely, there’ll be a fully functional cockpit for an aircraft other than the Viper, I’d bet on, at least, F/A-18 and maybe F15C, too. The fighters’ respective FM may also see some modifications, although I don’t expect them to ever be as good as current F-16 FM is. Finally, I think we will have at least one more theatre included in the basic install, most likely Israel, the Balkans or the Aegean.
As to WHEN we can expect the new version to be released, it would take a really seasoned prophet to tell, and with a huge error margin, too "
-
I posted this in another thread, but here’s where I believe it belongs:
"I don’t have any special wishes regarding the changes / amendments to appear in the next version of our sim, I’d rather rely on the expertise of its current devs and modders, I’ll risk some (un)educated guesses, though We’ll probably see new KTO terrain, something resembling Tom’s HighTiles for Korea, just polished and perfected. Most likely, there’ll be a fully functional cockpit for an aircraft other than the Viper, I’d bet on, at least, F/A-18 and maybe F15C, too. The fighters’ respective FM may also see some modifications, although I don’t expect them to ever be as good as current F-16 FM is. Finally, I think we will have at least one more theatre included in the basic install, most likely Israel, the Balkans or the Aegean.
As to WHEN we can expect the new version to be released, it would take a really seasoned prophet to tell, and with a huge error margin, too "
Does this mean Tom’s Hightiles wont have water on mountainsides?
-
My suggestion is… IFF/AIFF but I read, some back pages , that in 4.33 “no iff”. So, I ask, why?
-
My suggestion is… IFF/AIFF but I read, some back pages , that in 4.33 “no iff”. So, I ask, why?
Already discussed multible times.
Use the forum search, you’ll find the answer.Cheers,
LS -
My suggestion is… IFF/AIFF but I read, some back pages , that in 4.33 “no iff”. So, I ask, why?
:dhorse::dhorse::dhorse::dhorse:
-
- Slave mavericks sensors to the TGP.
- An improved HMCS for AG mode. If it’s realistic, of course. Right now on AG or NAV mode we can only see the STP with the HMCS, but can not see offset aimpoints, VRP and VIP and other visual helps. Also TD box like the one from DTOS mode. Again, i do not know if all those things that are visually available on the HUD are not in the HMCS, but it does seems like a shame that they are not displayed on the HMCS.
- Being able to carry the HTS and use the HAD page without having to carry HARMs.
I know they are three things, but let me just wish a little please.
-
If you could have one thing in the next update it would be.
The F-16s “best friend”
A Mig-29 with HIFI FM by Mav-JP with a nice 3D model (plane and pit) by Nizmo.
One wants to credit and honor the F-16 sim ? Then give the Viper its adequate historical adversary to “play with” :mrgreen:
-
Then we would Need a MiG-23… not the 29…when F-16 was set in duty a MiG-29 did not exist for many years For the 29 there is the F-15.
-
dinamic weather ,….not same climate for everyone!!! … I think is very important for to have more realism…and of course more planes
Thanks…good job guys
-
^ I think you already have this?
The weather parameters are transferred from the host to clients, and you can use probabilistic weather - dynamic.Of course it is not as fine as in Flight Sim X, nor does it use real world weather (or anything like that).
-
@A.S:
The F-16s “best friend”
A Mig-29 with HIFI FM by Mav-JP with a nice 3D model (plane and pit) by Nizmo.
One wants to credit and honor the F-16 sim ? Then give the Viper its adequate historical adversary to “play with” :mrgreen:
Then we would Need a MiG-23… not the 29…when F-16 was set in duty a MiG-29 did not exist for many years For the 29 there is the F-15.
we need both
- Fulcrum for mainstreem OPFOR and red nerds (spins, slides, low speed sluggish response/ overreactions, extensive trimming and AB climbing)
- Flogger for hardcore OPFOR and true masochists (ML, MLD ver.)
would be nice to implement lock-after-launch capability for semi-active missiles (even R-24 had this)….this would make BVR VVR engagements much more interresting (since we have rather bad modeled amraams regarding guidance etc.)
-
Then we would Need a MiG-23… not the 29…when F-16 was set in duty a MiG-29 did not exist for many years For the 29 there is the F-15.
roughly:
MiG-21Bis vs F-16A
later
MiG-29 vs F-16MiG-25PD vs F-15A
later
Su-27 vs F-15MiG-23 vs any playboy
-
New… perfect working… easy to use… Development - modding tools… for all aspects.