Iff you could have one thing in the next update it would be. (Archive)
-
Did anyone already mention Occulus VR Support?
I hope VR Devices and Environments will be the future of the way of gaming
-
Option to rearm on the ground.
Well I donāt know how much this will work for actual benefit or be used as a cheatā¦ I donāt think in real pilots land rearm and take off in a few minutesā¦
U can land and add a new flightā¦ u will loose DLINKā¦ hmmm Canāt u add a flight in the same package? I believe u canā¦
Wouldnāt this be more realistic? -
Ground personnel moving around and marshaling would bring more life to BMS! After all it is something a pilot sees and interacts alot before entering the runway for departure! Would be nice to see some guys around planesā¦
-
Option to rearm on the ground.
Ground rearm and refuel could be a prelude to some interesting single ship āinstant actionā type TEās. Not really realistic but challenging. It would keep your edge.
-
Ground rearm and refuel could be a prelude to some interesting single ship āinstant actionā type TEās. Not really realistic but challenging. It would keep your edge.
IMO perhaps a re-arm function would only serve in the BMS dogfight mode or instant action.
BTW Do people still use instant action??? -
IMO perhaps a re-arm function would only serve in the BMS dogfight mode or instant action.
BTW Do people still use instant action???yeapā¦ as a dev mostly used it to quickly check changes.
-
i dont know too much about it, but IRL dont they do some hot pit pilot xfers and rearming to turn the jet around for another mission?
i do like the ground crew idea a lot. maybe even some fuel trucks, handling carts, etc buzzing around.better night lighting at airbases too. range comms maybe as well.
-
Ground rearm and refuel could be a prelude to some interesting single ship āinstant actionā type TEās. Not really realistic but challenging. It would keep your edge.
If you taxi to the right spot on the airfield, your jet can already refuel on the ground during a dogfight mission.
Pro Tip: Doesnāt even have to be a friendly airport.
-
I use the ground refuel when doing what we call sport flying (irl). Turn up the winds/weather and using the TACAN to IFR to different airports to shoot landings with different crosswinds. Usually, I finish in the dark. Hot refuel turned out to be a cool feature. The other thing I do is t/o, do a 180 and blow up my airbase with 20mm and rockets. It would be nice to reload and level that sucker.
-
Takeoff times for the missions in the air tasking order. This would allow you to browse and choose one that occurs close to the current time.
-
Random mechanical failures, if not yet implemented (are they? didnāt ever investigated, to be honest).
-
Random mechanical failures, if not yet implemented (are they? didnāt ever investigated, to be honest).
Noā¦ not the way we would like.
ATM ā¦ it is just a Btest function not usable for ārealā mission. (IMO, You can find more info on the forum by using the search button) -
roughly:
MiG-21Bis vs F-16A
later
MiG-29 vs F-16MiG-25PD vs F-15A
later
Su-27 vs F-15
MiG-23 vs any playboy???
MiG-21 was available in greater numberst from mid '70s, the first TFW of F-16A reached IOC at end on 1979 or early 1980.
MiG-29s did not have R-27E until mid/late 1986.
MiG-25 ws PVO fighter it is not comparable with F-15 as a classical fighers and neither their operational areaā¦
Su-27 did not have R-73 until early of 1987 but yes, it has the same role as F-15s. -
donāt know if it is mentioned earlier but i have a ideaā¦
when airborne the tower says resume own navigationā¦butā¦
is it a idea to check into a radar station just like in real?
e.g. flying in Aegean, check in at Athens center at ā¦mhz etc etcthe radar station will call back to you that you are identified and maybe the station can request your intentionsā¦otherwise a simple call back with a resume or clear flight path will be greatā¦
on ātā (tower coms) page 3
1:check in radarstation (airborne etc)
2:check out radarstation (tower approach call or going tactical)just a idea, but a realistic one i think!
grtzz
George -
Hi,
Thsi topic is for peoples those who have new suggestions . I donāt know that if here is right place to make this topic or no, but if itās not plz transfer this topic to itās right place in forums. or may you say that some thing like this was created before. if itās created plz lock it and I will copy this post to that topic ,
MY new suggestion ,
1st: I want to ask BMS team to add new capability to BMS specially in next version by adding 2 player fly of 2 sit aircraft . for example in F-16D me and my friend who is new to BMS sit in the same F-16D & I will be instructor & heāll be student , then when the time passed I will sit in back cabin and he will be in front , then he can experience fly while I am watching him , for example in landing & ā¦ . it will be new fell of flying especially in combat missions or flying F-4 Phantoms or F-14 or ā¦ just imagine how much capabilities will be add to BMS if itās happen. at last, there are many aspect that will be covered by doing this.
2nd: why you are not try to expand BMS by adding some new avionics to it, I never mean to add about 100 different AC avionic to BMS at first time, but held a vote & ask user which AC they like in the next version to add it limited to BMS & expand it by time passing. after about 3 years you will see that BMS can support for example 4 different favorite AC & there are Very accurate while itās Main policy & ā¦ are base on F-16. in fact there are sub project not Main project. & and combination of my 1st suggestion & 2nd one is ā¦ā¦^^^^ OMG ^^^^ā¦
Heydar
-
just so long as thats a view for 4.34 I could support it.
I rather suspect that it would push 4.33 back indefinitely to achieve those goals.
-
Someone correct me if Iām wrong, but is it not impossible to have avionics in BMS other than that of the F-16? I recall reading this someone on the BMS forums a long time ago when someone asked why the BMS team didnāt give the F-18 its own avionicsā¦
-
Someone correct me if Iām wrong, but is it not impossible to have avionics in BMS other than that of the F-16? I recall reading this someone on the BMS forums a long time ago when someone asked why the BMS team didnāt give the F-18 its own avionicsā¦
anything is possible with code editsā¦ its just that there is not an infinite amount of dev time to devote to what would be at the very least a very extensive amount of work.
-
If you can provide the latest manuals about electronics and systems sure they can code anything, well in a bit more than 2-3 weeks.
But the Viper is still not up-to-date with the latest gadgets, so hold the horses until it is close to perfection.
-
All i would like to see is an easier way to install skins / models.
I canāt stand using the LOD editor.
oh, and ground rearming.