[BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team
-
@Virus said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@Killroy not everyone has this preference for the F-16c…
In reality everyone has its own preferences…mine is for the Ef-2000 for example…I would pay 500 euros for a proper simulator of it.This is about it… http://wargameguru.weebly.com/classic-review---eurofighter-2000.html
-
@Icer I still play it from time to time…
A modern version of it…exactly the same, but with modern graphics and VR support would be my dream. -
I fear you’ll have a little bit more to wait, then. Heatblur on “that other milsim” will release what you wish for, someday…
-
@P-J said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@molnibalage F-104 is also outdated for BMS but it has a cockpit in BMS
It is the heritage of the FreeFalcon. As I can recall Qawa made it.
No matter how nice the frame itself the plane if way out out timeframe. -
@Virus said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@Killroy not everyone has this preference for the F-16c…
In reality everyone has its own preferences…mine is for the Ef-2000 for example…I would pay 500 euros for a proper simulator of it.Good Day, Virus. I’m curious if you have tried the EF in an OFM Theater. If memory serves, that is a jet that has “seen some love”.
We would be appreciative of more feedback from someone who knows the jet. -
@Virus said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@Killroy not everyone has this preference for the F-16c…
In reality everyone has its own preferences…mine is for the Ef-2000 for example…I would pay 500 euros for a proper simulator of it.It is not possible to create a proper simulator because most of the advanced avionics of the EF2000 is classified, not mentioning its flight performance. When anybody thinks about a “proper simulator” is is better look back in time, far, far than early 2000s.
The SAMs and every other things became so advanced thanks to the better HW + SW which makes literally impossible to simulate then as individual systems. In fact even the SA-2/3/5 legacy systems are modeled on so “primitive” level compared to airplanes which is hard to imagine. Not even their some submodes and antenna behavior types are modeled. Just the difference between half leading and three point guidance. They have quite good missile kinematics, not so bad reaction time modeling and maybe, maybe the antenna beamwidth for RWR and now they have (as I know) some FRQ/WL modeling.
If you say that F-16C Block XY is 90% accurate and detailed compared to RL the SAMs are about ~ 20% or even lower. If we consider the reaction time, the information flow in an IADS and we go beyond legacy systems this is even lower…
If you asked me not a new plane but a better general environment is a better goal, is more easy to achieve and you can have a declassified stuff for them.
-
@molnibalage said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
It is the heritage of the FreeFalcon. As I can recall Qawa made it.
No matter how nice the frame itself the plane if way out out timeframe.look at minutes 3:20
Eric Aeyes had done it for FreeFalcon/RedViper.
I only collaborated with him on the DXM conversion. -
@Mav-jp said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
Remember falcon 3.0 MIG 29 module ? Why do you think our glorious dev ancestors have done a mig29 in falcon series ?
Because PvP is a very important part of the game and BMS is meant to die if we don’t offer multi platform to play with in MP. It would die by lack of users and it would die by lack of developers.
I always find this a tough question. Which red aircraft match in PvP with an F-16 block 50/52, fits into the 2000s, and is not way beyond at avionics and AA missiles? Duck hunting is fun, but only for the side with the shotgun
-
And what was this thread about again?
Every time I see a post I think: ah, cool, news from the BMS team…
-
@CriticalMass You’re right…
I’m closing this one for now…I already warned that topic deviated too much from just devs news…
PS: meanwhile I invite everyone to read https://forum.falcon-bms.com/topic/25861/how-bms-team-works
-
-
-