WIP: SA-6 Gainful
-
You are on real fire my friend Arek!
Thank you very much.
Nikos. -
Nice improvement, :drink:
-
Nice
-
Awesome!
-
-
Great work!
-
Looks so so good… [emoji122]
-
Niiiiice!!!
-
Fire control and guidance for the SA-6:
-
:shock: :shock: :shock:
…
-
N …. she said “No way!”. :rofl:
-
Beautiful! And so fast
-
N …. she said “No way!”. :rofl:
:neutral: :neutral: :neutral:
:rofl:
Good work and thank you Eghi!
-
can’t wait to see those in game!!!
I will make these beauties will suffer and so many brutal and creative yet realistically methods (no, going medieval on them with guns isn’t one of them) -
Both models are below 3k. I need to make some corrections because I made some mistakes (costs about 150 tris.)
The question is… we want more details?
I can do more for LOD1 (still below 4k).
LOD2 will be about 1000 tris anyway . -
-
What is your next plan. If anybody ever wish to model better different S-300 at lest first place with 3D models I can help with Hpasp with data.
-
The models are looking already beautiful, http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f82/lazystone/Smileys/c11.gif
but if you are not happy, then add some tris. http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f82/lazystone/Smileys/smiley-face-arms.gifCheers,http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f82/lazystone/Smileys/hat_3.gif
LSEfficiency in Falcon is a priority… not mine happy. But the nice eye candy is also welcome, that’s why I’m asking.
@ Molni
Next plan is: SA-8 -
Efficiency in Falcon is a priority… not mine happy. But the nice eye candy is also welcome, that’s why I’m asking.
@ Molni
Next plan is: SA-8I recommend the latest AKM varant.
-
Both models are below 3k. I need to make some corrections because I made some mistakes (costs about 150 tris.)
The question is… we want more details?
I can do more for LOD1 (still below 4k).
LOD2 will be about 1000 tris anyway .Hi Arek,
Please consider the following:
1. SA-6 specifically and mobile SAMs in general are usually “rare” vehicles in a given scene, so I guess you can go a bit more “expensive” than the usual tank or APC.2. Such vehicles may be important for view through IR/TV MFDs, sometimes the “specific look” of a given vehicle will be important so another good reason to consider more details when/if you think possible while keeping the limits.
3. Regardless of quality of the top LOD, please have in mind that such vehicles must keep their “properties” in all “viewable” distance, i.e even if I look at SA-6 radar from 10NM with LOD3 I should still be able to see the radar dish, even if very low quality, you see what I mean?
Cheers man!