Ff you could have one thing in the next update it would be…
-
I would like to have the possibility to be on a plane as “spectator” (or something like that) just to have the possibility to create a pseudo 2 seat capability. No need to add new avionics, just be on a plane that is been piloted by someone else.
-
I would like to have the possibility to be on a plane as “spectator” (or something like that) just to have the possibility to create a pseudo 2 seat capability. No need to add new avionics, just be on a plane that is been piloted by someone else.
This would be great. And if the user could pick the location, wherever, on the airfield/carrier or in an aircraft, all the better.
-
edit : nvm
-
The mission screen in a higher resolution.
-
Bigger than now? You know that the current one have already a map 4 time bigger than 4.32?
-
I would like to be able to turn off the in-sim cockpit MFD’s if extracting them to a second monitor. It would save a bunch of FPS not having to render the image twice. When I turn them off flying the A-10C in DCS I see at least a 15 FPS jump.
Next release then…
-
Study sim level F-15. Ducks.
-
Hmmmm.
Except IFF???
Mmmmm.
SAR. Or a proper RECCE would do the job just fine.
Ok, joke mode /off.
-
I would like a way to have the complete checklists in-game, on-screen, preferably on a small window so that it could be used while using the Oculus Rift without having to remove the headgear to read them.
-
Mmm. You can get a page on each knee using the pilot mod. Dont think you can change pages with it. That would probably be a worthy addition - particularly so for VR.
With that said, I dont think you need it for the OR. The Rift simply has too low resolution for you to be able to read a checklist in the game.
-
It was already mentioned, but I would also like to have a debriefing screen for TEs
-
I would love to see basket and drogue refueling. With that, naval ops feels more authentic.
-
+1 for accurate Navy refueling simulation.
-
This post is deleted! -
Missile Cruisers (Ticonderoga) actually using cruise missiles Destroyers also. I always see in the 2D That Naval ships bombarded DPRK troops or battalions if close enough to the coast but If I go ingame I dont see them do the same. Much like If I used to task an AC-130 in 2D. They will go devestate the enemy in 2D but in 3D they take off and land immediately.
-
Better avionics simulations for non-US aircraft. Hands down.
-
Here something very needed; multiple tacan stations working on same channels, west coordinates working.
-
Better avionics simulations for non-US aircraft. Hands down.
Better avionics and systems sims for ALL non-F-16 aircraft - hands down! Or a defined/specified way for 3rd parties to produce such as add-ons or mods…that would really be great.
-
I finally realized 1 glaring need for improvement for the next chapter in FBMS,
AI needs improvement. I know it has been said that the AI would be difficult to address but one can wish for it. I am referring to AI at just about every level. A lot of work involved to be sure, but that is something I would like to see done. Maybe someday……
-
A wider variety of OPFOR modeling/cockpits.