Ff you could have one thing in the next update it would be…
-
So keep on buying those “professional” tools for 5 bucks just because they have written on the box that they are “professional” and every Chineese in the world says that they are
Beliving everything everybody writes is a bad thing, even when the guy who written it is working for US goverment.In Poland we say that “point of view is based on where you sit”.
And i’d like you to read my posts again.
I am asking about MFD pages screens and nobody who have them already confirmed that they are classified. Dee-Jay still not even confirmed he have them. So whats the point in discussing law and forum rules when we don’t even know if the thing we talking about exists? I mean MFD drawingsJDAM MFD drawings for Hornet are unclassified. Even those related with GPS encryption. So when Hornet MFD drawings related with encryption are (U), why you think that Viper MFD drawings related with HTS would be classified?
-
hi macieksoft
nobody who have them already confirmed that they are classified
And nobody has said they are NOT
In Poland we say that “point of view is based on where you sit”.
That’s great but were not all in Poland this is multi-national and multi-cultural forum lets put it to rest move on and ask other questions or help with the Sim
this MFD question has been answered by others and the reason why you didnt get your answer let it be !!!
-
I think you have misunderstood some things on this sport…
I am asking about MFD pages screens
Who exactly told you that these are not classified, or these are available publicly somewhere? Let me give you an example. You leave in Poland, so you have an ecm suite named AIDEWS, a DB-110 recce pod, and the AGM-158 JASSM missile. Do you have any manuals or documents describing usage of these systems, layouts, and MFD screens setups? Nop you don’t…
JDAM MFD drawings for Hornet are unclassified. Even those related with GPS encryption. So when Hornet MFD drawings related with encryption are (U), why you think that Viper MFD drawings related with HTS would be classified?
This logic is not valid IMHO… BTW by the term “unclassified” means for military operators and specific services, not for common civilians and public availability.
-
Dee-Jay still not even confirmed he have them.
Mainly because I have nothing do add.
Period.
Let’s enjoy this extract from Top Gun :
-
So keep on buying those “professional” tools for 5 bucks just because they have written on the box that they are “professional” and every Chineese in the world says that they are
Beliving everything everybody writes is a bad thing, even when the guy who written it is working for US goverment.In Poland we say that “point of view is based on where you sit”.
And i’d like you to read my posts again.
I am asking about MFD pages screens and nobody who have them already confirmed that they are classified. Dee-Jay still not even confirmed he have them. So whats the point in discussing law and forum rules when we don’t even know if the thing we talking about exists? I mean MFD drawingsJDAM MFD drawings for Hornet are unclassified. Even those related with GPS encryption. So when Hornet MFD drawings related with encryption are (U), why you think that Viper MFD drawings related with HTS would be classified?
First of all, different services have different policies for each document. If the Navy wants to make a particular MFD page open to the public, up to them, but the USAF may not share the same approach.
Then : Unclassified do not mean open to public distribution. If a thing is unclassified but marked as “DOD only”, a military guy wont get to jail for sharing/distributing it, but definitely get administrative sanctions and a stain on his/her career. If a member of this forum, hypothetically, had access to such pages, that means a US or NATO service member leaked that document, thus breaking the law (if those pages are CONFIDENTIAL/SECRET) or risking administrative sanctions (for a “DOD only” or equivalent page). Then the document may find its way onto other people who are not under the same law and may want to post here. But the fact that the poster himself is not in legal trouble is irrelevant : allowing those people to post means encouraging/helping service members to compromise documents. And we are NOT going to do that. End of discussion.
-
This post is deleted! -
So keep on buying those “professional” tools for 5 bucks just because they have written on the box that they are “professional” and every Chineese in the world says that they are
Beliving everything everybody writes is a bad thing, even when the guy who written it is working for US goverment.In Poland we say that “point of view is based on where you sit”.
And i’d like you to read my posts again.
I am asking about MFD pages screens and nobody who have them already confirmed that they are classified. Dee-Jay still not even confirmed he have them. So whats the point in discussing law and forum rules when we don’t even know if the thing we talking about exists? I mean MFD drawingsJDAM MFD drawings for Hornet are unclassified. Even those related with GPS encryption. So when Hornet MFD drawings related with encryption are (U), why you think that Viper MFD drawings related with HTS would be classified?
Just a word of caution sir. If you continue to push this, I see a vacation for you on the horizon.
As Crusader has already pointed out (and quite well I might add) that just because it is on some pirate server somewhere, does not mean it is “ok to post it”. Too many leakers have caused enough problems. Don’t need to host any more new leaker crap that we have no need to know about in the first place. BMS will “simulate” any grey areas. That means IF they decide to model something (like the F-35 for example) it would be a “best guess” or “educated guess” as to how it will operate in the sim. Will it be 100% accurate? NOPE. Most of the stuff I see in BMS is not 100% accurate anyway, but it is close. In fact, it CAN"T BE 100% ACCURATE. No one has the actual data needed for 100% accuracy. So, 70% accurate, I can live with that, but we don’t know how accurate BMS is. But I can tell you that it is not 100%, and it never will be.
I feel that the devs have been extra lenient with you. But I wouldn’t push it if I were you.
-
Hey, I just got a hold of some declassified info on HUDs. Here ya go…
http://imageshack.com/a/img922/2842/E8w3Z5.jpg
Also I got some great IP stuff here…
-
In Poland we say that “point of view is based on where you sit”.
…I’m keeping this one.
-
the HTS is touchy because of ether physics, and like many point out, the radioactive side of things.
I was thinking, how hard would a HUD only view that worked with trackIR be?
-
the HTS is touchy because of ether physics, and like many point out, the radioactive side of things.
I was thinking, how hard would a HUD only view that worked with trackIR be?
Pretty sure that’s been done…because that’s what you need if you’re building a cockpit. I have a little utility stashed called “Set HUD Only” that I’m pretty sure does that.
OTOH, I’m building a cockpit with a working HUD…so I don’t want a HUD or anything but OTW. Which can be done too…
-
Also I got some great IP stuff here…
Damn Jhook!!! You’ve made collateral casualties … your have rickrolled me!
-
Heeyyy… this is from WOPR!! This is highly classified data there!!
-
shall we play a game :mrgreen::mrgreen:
-
Oh yes nuclear warfare! Shall we? Shall we? [emoji38]
sent from my mi5 using Tapatalk
-
WOPR was a hater, you just need to put netflix on there and let him play Falcon.
-
Haha. I think I’d rather just get the CPD and call it 6.1-lite. But all the way to 7+ AND an ATD? Ambitious… What would people do with all that information presented so neatly at a glance? Besides I think the people here might not be able to handle a true color RWR, it would throw everything in a tizzy.
And the problem is???
-
Maybe not a big thing but sometimes it feel like when communicating with AWACS, Tower etc. it feels like I should be verbally acknowledging things they tell me. Maybe add a option for responses such as, (Viper1 Copy, etc) and if you don’t respond they keep repeating. Yes maybe it would drive you nuts but in real world situations, the person transmitting information always looks to hear a response that you acknowledge their transmission of information. Similar to your wing man responses when you give them a command, most of the time you get an acknowledgement they heard and are complying with your command. (Flight Lead:" 2 Close it up"/ Wingman: "2, Closing up). Of course this is alot easier using voice command programs thats why I mention it could be a option in the config settings.
As a wingman, if lead can see you move your jet you don’t acknowledge. Some things you won’t acknowledge. And some things you’ll just say “2”. I’d never answer “2, closing up”. I’d just go to where they told me (e.g. “2, go tac right side”, [go to tactical] or “Venom, new joker, bingo two-five, two-oh”, “2”, “3”, “4”).
-
As a wingman, if lead can see you move your jet you don’t acknowledge. Some things you won’t acknowledge. And some things you’ll just say “2”. I’d never answer “2, closing up”. I’d just go to where they told me (e.g. “2, go tac right side”, [go to tactical] or “Venom, new joker, bingo two-five, two-oh”, “2”, “3”, “4”).
There is also the double “clip”. Often just a double “clip” to respond to simple request from the flight lead is used as well. Just thought I would mention that.
-
BMS is awesome as it is, the better visual stuff I would like would cost FPS big time so I’d say ‘Its great as it is’ without a total code rewrite.