Taiwan 4.35.3 (compatible with bms 4.35u1)
-
Fix for prc rwr problem is now in updated hotfix on first post.
I don’t put it here , in case I forget to delete here in next hotfix. -
Had to adjust hotfix to version 50921 to make j20a not show as f22 in rwr.
In first post. -
J-8F RWR shows
J-10A and J-10C RWR J-16 RWR <30>
J-20 RWR <25> -
In the new 4.35 installation, there is no default “data folder”. There is one in the older installations.
-
Should we make the HQ-16 based on SA-17 RWR? According to Wikipedia is based on a BUK originally. Right now it shows up as a patriot
-
HQ-17 is based on SA-15 “Gauntlet”" Tor M1" . a Chinese version " SA-15" improvement. it needed to be shown as “15”
-
Should we make the HQ-17 based on SA-17 RWR? According to Wikipedia is based on a BUK originally. Right now it shows up as a patriot
you mean HQ-16 right? yes it needs RWR edit.
we don’t have HQ-17 in DB - it’s a SA-15 copy.
-
if it’s about HQ-16, i think it’s no problem to show “17” for HQ-16. Because the role of HQ-16 is much like the SA-17
Furthermore, both missiles are very similar in shape.
-
oops yes I meant HQ-16. HQ-16 is currently patriot right now. Very confusing because it will show lethal inner ring at very far ranges. Can we please change that to 17 on the RWR?
Another feedback is that its currently pretty impossible to fight the J-20, usually you cant get any lock until 10 miles or less. I’d imagine that you would be able to lock on further out than that (20-25 miles?). There’s no info out there about the efficacy of stealth aircraft (its all classified) but i’d imagine just based on physical properties of radar cross section you’d be able to get a lock closer. Currently there is no way to attack a J-20. We had 1 J-20 kill 5 of us in a flight and we all had tally on it but couldn’t get locks.
-
Hotfix in first post updated to 51821
Hq16 has same radar as sa17
J20 has rcs 0.25 -
Just a quick comment, to avoid confusion with BMS versions, I would suggest that you avoid using 4.35.3 as it relates to 4.35 Update 3 which doesn’t exist yet?)
It would make more sense that you indicate a different version and say with what version it is compatible.
Cheers
-
how about 435.1.3? 435U1.3 ?
once U2 out, new mod could be 435.2.1 or 435U2.1 .
-
how about 435.1.3? 435U1.3 ?
once U2 out, new mod could be 435.2.1 or 435U2.1 .
Okay , this sounds fine.
Next main update will be like this. -
I mean use the version you think fit for your theater but just mention in the title what version of Falcon it is compatible with…
Like Kuwait v1.0.2 (compatible: Falcon BMS 4.35.1 U1)The more I think about it, the more I think I need to put in place something for theaters to keep track of all of that…
Cheers
-
I mean use the version you think fit for your theater but just mention in the title what version of Falcon it is compatible with…
Like Kuwait v1.0.2 (compatible: Falcon BMS 4.35.1 U1)The more I think about it, the more I think I need to put in place something for theaters to keep track of all of that…
Cheers
Max;
Could you put a sticky a thread which contains an alphabetical list of all the theatres that work with the current version of BMS 4.35.X along with direct links to the download thread?
-
Johku has made a blog entry listing all available theaters for 4.35
-
So, well done to him, and thanks a lot to you, dear Stevie.
With best regards to all.
-
We should use Traditional Chinese as the version number
-
:rofl
-
Hey everyone, just downloaded this theater but I’m running into a problem. Whenever I run the installer I get an error that says “Source Archive Failed Authentication!” and it won’t install the theater. What is the problem?