Development of new aircraft and cockpits
-
Does anyone know who made this f-5 pit: https://www.electronicbattlefield.co/pages/cockpits.html?
-
Does anyone know who made this f-5 pit: https://www.electronicbattlefield.co/pages/cockpits.html?
Hi !
We know it exactly.
EBF/Nizmo was banned from here a couple years ago for ripping copyrighted 3D models.
Cheers,
Radium
-
Does anyone know who made this f-5 pit
Everything you see on this website is … a big pain and a big shame in Falcon4 history (link is normally forbidden on BMS forum)
This guy (Nizmo) and Co … stolen a lot of stuff even to some of their friends who trusted them. Nizmo tried to sell some material that wasn’t his (F-15 Cockpit, Theater …)
Similar to what SankeMan from PMC Tactical tried before him (grab other ppl’s productions, compile, sell to make money).
We lost Qawa during this story with Nizmo. -
Wanna talk more about this?
Hello Seifer,
While thinking about it wisely, I think that a custom radar for F-5E would be really great.
That being said,
I think that as long as it’s an F-16 simulator, we shall maybe look what’s next for F-16 with F-16 block 701/72, with center screen, moving map etc…
Just my feeling !
Radium
-
Hello Seifer,
While thinking about it wisely, I think that a custom radar for F-5E would be really great.
That being said,
I think that as long as it’s an F-16 simulator, we shall maybe look what’s next for F-16 with F-16 block 701/72, with center screen, moving map etc…
Just my feeling !
RadiumNice! Of course those of us using Helios already have that…
-
So, does anyone know on what his F-5 pit was based? Maybe we can use that one instead?
@Radium: the beauty of software, is that it is exactly soft. It is what we make of it. If we keep thinking this is a F-16 simulator, it will be only an F-16 simulator. But once we change this mindset, we can make it whatever we want.
I don’t have any problem with F-16s. I just like the feeling of flying other aircraft. Back in old days, I used to fly F-15s using Eric Aeyes cockpit and had a lot of fun with it. I know, under the hood, it was still an F16. But it had two engines, was full of missiles, a powerful machine. It gave me the feeling of flying a different aircraft. Gosh I even flew a MP mission where the objective was escorting a C-130 and I was the C-130 pilot, it was a helluva fun.
IMHO we have reached a level of realism in the F-16 that each small improvement is very hard to achieve. Going from 99.9999 to 99.99999 can be very tough. Now, improving other aircraft from 20% to 50%: this can be a lot of fun, rewarding and require less effort.
Last, regarding those recent F16 blocks, I guess those information are probably classified as well. OTOH, info for F-5 E should be there somewhere.
Edit: OH, just look what the Mafia folks are doing. That is inspiring.
-
Edit: OH, just look what the Mafia folks are doing. That is inspiring.
Where you can see what mafia folks are doing? Are they on discord right? I can’t find them…
Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk
-
So, does anyone know on what his F-5 pit was based? Maybe we can use that one instead?
@Radium: the beauty of software, is that it is exactly soft. It is what we make of it. If we keep thinking this is a F-16 simulator, it will be only an F-16 simulator. But once we change this mindset, we can make it whatever we want.
I don’t have any problem with F-16s. I just like the feeling of flying other aircraft. Back in old days, I used to fly F-15s using Eric Aeyes cockpit and had a lot of fun with it. I know, under the hood, it was still an F16. But it had two engines, was full of missiles, a powerful machine. It gave me the feeling of flying a different aircraft. Gosh I even flew a MP mission where the objective was escorting a C-130 and I was the C-130 pilot, it was a helluva fun.
IMHO we have reached a level of realism in the F-16 that each small improvement is very hard to achieve. Going from 99.9999 to 99.99999 can be very tough. Now, improving other aircraft from 20% to 50%: this can be a lot of fun, rewarding and require less effort.
Last, regarding those recent F16 blocks, I guess those information are probably classified as well. OTOH, info for F-5 E should be there somewhere.
Edit: OH, just look what the Mafia folks are doing. That is inspiring.
Seifer,
don’t get me wrong : I’m really into getting new stuff into BMS !
I can make or get one F-5E cockpit. 100%. Can you make a legacy radar for it ?
Cheers,
Radium
-
Where you can see what mafia folks are doing? Are they on discord right? I can’t find them…
Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk
“BMS Fighters Mafia”, send drkbkj a message over in the Project Bug thread to ask for an invite…
-
IMHO we have reached a level of realism in the F-16 that each small improvement is very hard to achieve. Going from 99.9999 to 99.99999 can be very tough. Now, improving other aircraft from 20% to 50%: this can be a lot of fun, rewarding and require less effort.
Not at all my dear Seifer.
There is a lot still missing and not necessarily Uber complex.
TACAN REC functions, ECM pannel, STBY ADI, SMS setup page, just to name few of them. The A/G radar itself would deserve a total revamp. … And I already hear some guys thinking loud about the L16.Aside from the a/c itself, many valuable impossible to the mission planner, ATO, weapon effects … etc …
-
“Could anyone say if there is the development of new aircraft and their respective complete cockpits?”
I have a MUCH better question: Could we have further development of the F-16 models and their cockpits? As good as they are now, I bet they can be even better!
I only ask because this is a FALCON (F-16) Combat Simulator.
-
Not at all my dear Seifer.
There is a lot still missing and not necessarily Uber complex.
TACAN REC functions, ECM pannel, STBY ADI, SMS setup page, just to name few of them. The A/G radar itself would deserve a total revamp. … And I already hear some guys thinking loud about the L16.Aside from the a/c itself, many valuable impossible to the mission planner, ATO, weapon effects … etc …
And rest assured, we will always have plenty of ppl going for this extra sip of realism. I’m glad we have real references like you
-
Seifer,
don’t get me wrong : I’m really into getting new stuff into BMS !
I can make or get one F-5E cockpit. 100%. Can you make a legacy radar for it ?
Cheers,
Radium
I can try, but I will need good references, and motivation. Right now I am focusing on U3, but after that, sounds like a cool project.
-
… sounds like a cool project.
IIRC “I-Hawk” had already an generally coding idea … to make the avionic etc. modular,
to be usefull for other AC as well.There was also a thread here on the forum on this topic, … I’m to lazy to search …;)
Cheers, :yo:
LS -
“Could anyone say if there is the development of new aircraft and their respective complete cockpits?”
I have a MUCH better question: Could we have further development of the F-16 models and their cockpits? As good as they are now, I bet they can be even better!
I only ask because this is a FALCON (F-16) Combat Simulator.
with the A cockpit as well?
-
How about a real decent F-15E cockpit and flight model. These come in very handy for AG missions. Many of the AI F-15E return with lots of unused load on them although there may be still targets available at target site.
-
How about a real decent F-15E cockpit and flight model. These come in very handy for AG missions. Many of the AI F-15E return with lots of unused load on them although there may be still targets available at target site.
F-15E is far too classified… We don’t know much about her. Also, it’s a really complex aircraft compared to F-16.
Also, F-15E are USAF only fighters. We can’t rely on export information. F-15SG, QA and SA are not F-15E !
-
F-15E is far too classified… We don’t know much about her. Also, it’s a really complex aircraft compared to F-16.
Also, F-15E are USAF only fighters. We can’t rely on export information. F-15SG, QA and SA are not F-15E !
Compared to F-16 variants which are in the game…?
-
Compared to F-16 variants which are in the game…?
F-15E is a very sensible aircraft, I don’t know how to tell it differently.
-
IIRC “I-Hawk” had already an generally coding idea … to make the avionic etc. modular,
to be usefull for other AC as well.There was also a thread here on the forum on this topic, … I’m to lazy to search …;)
Cheers, :yo:
LSMaybe this
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?42173-hypothetical-question-on-Avionics-in-BMS/page2&highlight=avionics
(TL/DR: platform-izing BMS is a great future vision but a huge level of effort… and will probably happen slowly over a long time horizon)