BMS 4.36 DEV SERIES - AGM 65L
-
A super useful video and a super annoying way to get that code right.
-
Only one mistake … AFAIK it is AGM65 E version, L is unknown to me … need to check., maybe i’m old
Anyway, GREAT work,… exactly as it was in 1998/9 in Janes FA18 -
-
@Micro_440th Really…
Maverick E uses a laser designator guidance system optimized for fortified installations using a delayed fuse combined with a heavier penetrating blast-fragmentation warhead (140 kg (300 lb) vs. 57 kg (125 lb) in older models) that perforates a target with its kinetic energy before detonation. It achieved IOC in 1985 and was used mainly by USMC aviation.
Maverick E2/L model incorporates a laser-guided seeker that allows for designation by the launch aircraft, another aircraft, or a ground source and can engage small, fast moving, and maneuvering targets on land and at sea.
Eh, what’s new ?
-
Plz … Maybe just do an update to a bigger “X” (if possible) , for those with poor eyesight .
TY – not now , in …few weeks -
@Batman … and ppl would say that salh is walk in a park
-
LMAV…FINALLY!!!
-
@Mav-jp Hi there, i cant get the missile to hit the target. I am not sure what i’m doing wrong. Steps for laser designation are simple but still the missile misses the target. Any advice will be helpful- thanks.
-
It definitely works
- assume self laze?
- have you set up the laser?
- laser arm switch?
- trigger to fire laser?
- clear line of sight?
- used in limits?
- target in keyhole?
- missile ready?
-
@Migbuster Yes it worked indeed. Thanks a lot
-
Great work to get the laser variant in the game!
Had also the problem that I could not hit something. In my case I could solve it by immediately doing a manual (first trigger detent) lasing (the 40s programmed via DED for some reason where not enough) and keeping it all the time. Watching at the trajectory of the missile, you can see that it drops the nose down quite fast after launch. If the laser is not applied quickly it cannot recover with a proper path to the target.
… just wanted to explain a bit, in case someone had the same problem.
Keep up the good work dev-team! -
@Mav-jp - are the SCAN, SLAVE, and CAGE functions also modeled? Couldn’t really tell from the video…unless there is some symbology missing.
-
is the lasing on this automatic or does it have to be done manually?
-
@Alfred manually
-
Ahh, finally the manual lasing trigger became significant. Thank you Max.
-
@Stevie said in BMS 4.36 DEV SERIES - AGM 65L:
@Mav-jp - are the SCAN, SLAVE, and CAGE functions also modeled? Couldn’t really tell from the video…unless there is some symbology missing.
Not modelled
-
@Tumbler31 - thought so…great to have LMAV, still room for improvement.
-
I noticed that the pull gets very limited once the laser is fired
-
@Alfred - the MAVL does have a reduced field of regard over the MAVE, but it shouldn’t really be that noticeable.
Your ability to hold a track should be as good as the TGP ability to track and lase during a pull, it’s just that now you are going to get some positive feedback on how you’re doing.
And the laser modes should be in accord with the baseline TGP track mode(s). Trigger lase should be an option, not a requirement.
-
@Alfred you mean your control of the aircraft changes when the laser is firing?