4.37 killed the AMRAAM
-
@Prot hi Prot, we are trying to help here. If there is a person that understands a lot of aim120 code this person is MavJP.
All his is asking is more information, because we are unable to reproduce the situation on our side.
We are trying to get more people to try this and see if there is a common denominator. So all kinds of informations will be useful. Except, perhaps, the size of your panties (although I suspect @Aragorn will find it useful).
-
-
@Seifer said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@Prot hi Prot, we are trying to help here. If there is a person that understands a lot of aim120 code this person is MavJP.
All his is asking is more information, because we are unable to reproduce the situation on our side.
We are trying to get more people to try this and see if there is a common denominator. So all kinds of informations will be useful. Except, perhaps, the size of your panties (although I suspect @Aragorn will find it useful).
Is there a clear repro procedure? We know how we are.
-
@LorikEolmin seems to me there is some serious overclock. I would recomment to revert the stock values and try again to discard this variable from the equation.
-
@LorikEolmin said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@Seifer said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@Prot hi Prot, we are trying to help here. If there is a person that understands a lot of aim120 code this person is MavJP.
All his is asking is more information, because we are unable to reproduce the situation on our side.
We are trying to get more people to try this and see if there is a common denominator. So all kinds of informations will be useful. Except, perhaps, the size of your panties (although I suspect @Aragorn will find it useful).
Is there a clear repro procedure? We know how we are.
Just fly the TE of this post and engage the MIG29s
-
In case you want to check if the multithreaded code could be related to it, you can disable it by adding to your
Falcon BMS.cfg
set g_sCpuPerfOptimizations "all-PARALLEL_DRAW_OBJLIST-PARALLEL_DRAW_PLATFORM"
-
@Seifer said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
In case you want to check if the multithreaded code could be related to it, you can disable it by adding to your
Falcon BMS.cfg
set g_sCpuPerfOptimizations "all-PARALLEL_DRAW_OBJLIST-PARALLEL_DRAW_PLATFORM"
@Prot please test same TE in SP with those lines in your CFG
-
Hey guys,
first, sorry for the dead link to my GDrive yesterday. It was a classic error 66.Here the Link again for everybody who wants to test the TE.
Iāve just flown the mission again, offline
Mustang 61, human
Mustang 62, AI
MIGās, of course AII also provided the ACMI on the GDrive. (2023-02-03_17-49-08.zip.acmi)
In my opinion the first 2 missiles shot in the first engagement performed normally. The next missiles went wired again like in the other two tests. Especially in the endgame!
On the second engagement everything was ok.So I think I was only partial able to reproduce the strange behavior of the missile.
Next test will be in MP later on. -
@EuKeule said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
Hey guys,
first, sorry for the dead link to my GDrive yesterday. It was a classic error 66.Here the Link again for everybody who wants to test the TE.
Iāve just flown the mission again, offline
Mustang 61, human
Mustang 62, AI
MIGās, of course AII also provided the ACMI on the GDrive. (2023-02-03_17-49-08.zip.acmi)
In my opinion the first 2 missiles shot in the first engagement performed normally. The next missiles went wired again like in the other two tests. Especially in the endgame!
On the second engagement everything was ok.So I think I was only partial able to reproduce the strange behavior of the missile.
Next test will be in MP later on.Please test with the above flags In Your cfg
-
@EuKeule said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
Hey guys,
first, sorry for the dead link to my GDrive yesterday. It was a classic error 66.Here the Link again for everybody who wants to test the TE.
Iāve just flown the mission again, offline
Mustang 61, human
Mustang 62, AI
MIGās, of course AII also provided the ACMI on the GDrive. (2023-02-03_17-49-08.zip.acmi)
In my opinion the first 2 missiles shot in the first engagement performed normally. The next missiles went wired again like in the other two tests. Especially in the endgame!
On the second engagement everything was ok.So I think I was only partial able to reproduce the strange behavior of the missile.
Next test will be in MP later on.
No need MPSP only matters at that stage
Have you got your most recent acmi in SP ?
-
@Mav-jp said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@LorikEolmin said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@Seifer said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@Prot hi Prot, we are trying to help here. If there is a person that understands a lot of aim120 code this person is MavJP.
All his is asking is more information, because we are unable to reproduce the situation on our side.
We are trying to get more people to try this and see if there is a common denominator. So all kinds of informations will be useful. Except, perhaps, the size of your panties (although I suspect @Aragorn will find it useful).
Is there a clear repro procedure? We know how we are.
Just fly the TE of this post and engage the MIG29s
Haha fly the damn TE and youāll see, thatās exactly what I feel like saying myself for obvious stuff sometimes.
Iām flying tonight, Iāll test it soon and post the result in 3-4 weeks.
-
@Mav-jp said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
I donāt see any signature
And I advise you to calm your tone
Sorry, I didnāt mean to offend you. I did not know that my signature is not seen by some. I didnāt find a switch in the settings to change that.
Signature:
Processor: Intel Core I7 9700k @ 3.6 GHz -> 5.0 GHz; Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING; RAM 32 GB Corsar CMK32 DDR-4 2998; Graphic1: ASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1080 8GB DDR5X; Graphic2: DisplayLink USB-VGA Display Adapter Monitor1: Iiyama PL4071UH 40ā 3840x2160 pix; Monitor2: Acer AL1716 19ā 1280x1024 pix (for MFD frames); SSD: 1TB WD Black SN750 Gaming M.2 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe; HOTAS: Warthog; TrackIR; ICP -
@Prot said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
Sorry, I didnāt mean to offend you. I did not know that my signature is not seen by some. I didnāt find a switch in the settings to change that.
Signatures are only seen once on your first post into the thread otherwise it would be unreadableā¦
-
@Mav-jp said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
Have you got your most recent acmi in SP ?
All files can be downloaded from the GDrive: Link
Recent SP file without any changes is: 2023-02-03_17-49-08.zip.acmi
Recent SP file with the recommended additional line in bms user.cfg is: 2023-02-03_19-49-14.zip.acmi
Recent MP file is: 2023-02-03_19-47-29.zip.acmiOn the MP file we could repro the strange missile behavior. Take a look at the second engagement Mustang6 Flight on the āveteranā MIG-29. Remarkable is the strange behavior in the endgame. Overall zero missile found the target at these engagement!
-
@EuKeule said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@Mav-jp said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
Have you got your most recent acmi in SP ?
All files can be downloaded from the GDrive: Link
Recent SP file without any changes is: 2023-02-03_17-49-08.zip.acmi
Recent SP file with the recommended additional line in bms user.cfg is: 2023-02-03_19-49-14.zip.acmi
Recent MP file is: 2023-02-03_19-47-29.zip.acmiOn the MP file we could repro the strange missile behavior. Take a look at the second engagement Mustang6 Flight on the āveteranā MIG-29. Remarkable is the strange behavior in the endgame. Overall zero missile found the target at these engagement!
the MP one is beyond any understanding
i need the ACMI of both alpha and keule of the MP engagement
who is hosting ? i think there is a real host issue here
The BLoodhound one is perfectly fine except for the last one that exibhits the issue.
i dont understand why i canāt reproduce it
-
@EuKeule said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@Mav-jp said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
Have you got your most recent acmi in SP ?
All files can be downloaded from the GDrive: Link
Recent SP file without any changes is: 2023-02-03_17-49-08.zip.acmi
Recent SP file with the recommended additional line in bms user.cfg is: 2023-02-03_19-49-14.zip.acmi
Recent MP file is: 2023-02-03_19-47-29.zip.acmiOn the MP file we could repro the strange missile behavior. Take a look at the second engagement Mustang6 Flight on the āveteranā MIG-29. Remarkable is the strange behavior in the endgame. Overall zero missile found the target at these engagement!
can you test those ones ?
https://mega.nz/file/rktV2J4B#BktTT787k4w1vDqzZE5qpou65KR0-gVMEzqtkIv-RfY
please stop MP test , for now SP only !!! i want to rule out Host issue
BTW you need to put those missiles files in both balkans and Korea misdata folders
Donāt forget to back up
-
Other test to perform
please add this
set g_sPriorityFixes "all-PFIX_AHR_GUIDANCE"
in your Falcon BMS User file and test
-
and finally if all the above tests have failed
try this one
https://mega.nz/file/mx9RFB4S#3WASFENF2p5WMmbcLDUSXHoOQAoQCM5y10lCA3PUJXs
BTW you need to put those missiles files in both balkans and Korea misdata folders
Donāt forget to back up
-
are you flying all VR or pancakes ?
-
@Mav-jp said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
are you flying all VR or pancakes ?
Those, who had these issues, fly without VR.
The one with VR (that is me) had not issues but good kills.
Youāre not trying to tell us, that VR is now somehow mandatory in BVR?