[BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team
-
@tiag said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@molnibalage this has changed, Molni. Any type of avionics can be modelled, it is just a question of energy and time to dev it. You will see some work on the F-15 in that regard, very different from the F-16.
I know that any type can be modeled. But if we compare an F-16C to an F-15C they are essentially twin brothers if the MiG-21BIS is the bar.
-
Count on me if anyone opens a MIG project.
-
@VIPER-0 said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
Count on me if anyone opens a MIG project.
It is on the list (will take a while, though).
-
SUPER.
-
From a development point of view, are warbirds/prop aircraft possible in BMS?
-
@MCDeedle there are prop airplanes but I donât think the modeling is good.
For now, forget about thisâŚ
-
@MaxWaldorf Eh I only bring it up because it would add a lot of variety without needing to model a lot of complicated avionics and computer systems.
Wouldnât it?
-
@MCDeedle we represent initially a 2000 era conflict based sim based on F-16 and other aircraftsâŚ
Il2 and DCS already cover those WWII aspects. No interest for usâŚ
-
@molnibalage F-104 is also outdated for BMS but it has a cockpit in BMS
-
@MCDeedle said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@MaxWaldorf Eh I only bring it up because it would add a lot of variety without needing to model a lot of complicated avionics and computer systems.
Wouldnât it?
Hi, McDeedle. You need to keep in mind that in BMS is bound to the Viper avionics. So, what specifically are you seeking? Youâre looking for real old school maybe try the A-10C without radar, TACAN, etc. If you specifically want WWII, then thatâs an issue.
-
@drtbkj said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@MCDeedle said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@MaxWaldorf Eh I only bring it up because it would add a lot of variety without needing to model a lot of complicated avionics and computer systems.
Wouldnât it?
Hi, McDeedle. You need to keep in mind that in BMS is bound to the Viper avionics. So, what specifically are you seeking? Youâre looking for real old school maybe try the A-10C without radar, TACAN, etc. If you specifically want WWII, then thatâs an issue.
this is false information !!
BMS is NOT bound to f16 avionics at all , best proof beeing the f15 that is currently under development with totally different avionics
-
@drtbkj
i think these two mfds say otherwise -
@Mav-jp said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@drtbkj said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@MCDeedle said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@MaxWaldorf Eh I only bring it up because it would add a lot of variety without needing to model a lot of complicated avionics and computer systems.
Wouldnât it?
Hi, McDeedle. You need to keep in mind that in BMS is bound to the Viper avionics. So, what specifically are you seeking? Youâre looking for real old school maybe try the A-10C without radar, TACAN, etc. If you specifically want WWII, then thatâs an issue.
this is false information !!
BMS is NOT bound to f16 avionics at all , best proof beeing the f15 that is currently under development with totally different avionics
Well, when the Eagle comes out, and is refined, then I will happily amend that statement. .However, itâs a moot point. I was answering McDeedle , who asked about other, possibly specific to WWII, avionics. And, whether he used Viper or F-15 avionics, he still would not have the old-school/more austere avionics he asked about. So, with all due respect, my statement was not false. My hope remains that in the future that wonât be the case.
-
@drtbkj said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@Mav-jp said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@drtbkj said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@MCDeedle said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@MaxWaldorf Eh I only bring it up because it would add a lot of variety without needing to model a lot of complicated avionics and computer systems.
Wouldnât it?
Hi, McDeedle. You need to keep in mind that in BMS is bound to the Viper avionics. So, what specifically are you seeking? Youâre looking for real old school maybe try the A-10C without radar, TACAN, etc. If you specifically want WWII, then thatâs an issue.
this is false information !!
BMS is NOT bound to f16 avionics at all , best proof beeing the f15 that is currently under development with totally different avionics
Well, when the Eagle comes out, and is refined, then I will happily amend that statement. .However, itâs a moot point. I was answering McDeedle , who asked about other, possibly specific to WWII, avionics. And, whether he used Viper or F-15 avionics, he still would not have the old-school/more austere avionics he asked about. So, with all due respect, my statement was not false. My hope remains that in the future that wonât be the case.
BMs team can implement whatever avionics and system they want.
The day BMs wants to implement a ww2 plane there will be no issue to implement all systems related
Your statement is not valid , period
-
@drtbkj as mav said, its just a matter of interest and time, anything is possible with the advent of the f15c
-
@Mav-jp Interesting it is. But I fly Falcon BMS mainly becouse i love the Falcon. Not the Eagle, even if that is a machine i admire. Perhaps the developers are in the wrong course when they prefere to use time on the Eagle instead of developing F16 to its up to date standards, and forget Link16 and further looking into the new era of F16V and Block 70/72. In Nordic Theater i defend Norway together with the Finnish and Swedish Air Force, and we have been cooperating with Link16 in many years in RL. Exept in BMS. My sugestion is to stick to the Viper, and let others find another suitable simulators they can fly if they prefere anothers planes. But they will regret, the dynamic scenarios in BMS is so good that every serious Pilot will sooner ore later seek back
-
@Killroy I dont think we as users are in a position to lecture the devs on the direction they are taking. I for one am incredibley excited for the F15.
I would imagine that development of more modern systems for the F16 are still heavily classified and if implemented would be mostly âguessingâ
-
@1508AD said in [BMS Roadmap 4.37 U3] News from the BMS Team:
@Killroy I dont think we as users are in a position to lecture the devs on the direction they are taking. I for one am incredibley excited for the F15.
I think we as users are certainly entitled to have an opinion, and voice that opinion, about the relatively recent re-direction of the Falcon F-16 simulator, and I 100% completely agree with Killroy, as Iâve made more than one earlier posts about precisely what his concerns are. In line with his rationale, every minute spent on developing the Falcon F-15 simulator is one minute spent away of improving and refining the F-16 and other aspects of this F-16 simulator. Further, there is not a doubt in my mind that 4.37.3 would have been released many weeks ago if not for this preoccupation with the F-15 coding.
The fact that you are âincredibly excited for the F-15â goes a long way to explaining you wagging your finger at Killroy for daring to voice his opinion. Believe it or not, there are many users who remain loyal to the original premise of this amazing Falcon story, and are not that interested in developing some other plane in this Falcon F-16 simulator.
-
Yes of course entitled to an opinion as am I.
If the Devs wish to focus on VR or the F15 or a spaceship then that is their perogitive. It is not my free time nor is it a paid product. We are all free to apply to join the team and commit time to the product or create our own.
The original product released in 1998 from memory so the original premise would be a Falcon consitent with with this general time period which i believe relatively is what we have here today.
Thanks for the reply
-
There are so many aspects of the BMS sim :
Campaign, ground objects, ground/sea vehicles.
Graphics & newest things to add to the realism.And above all, the F-16.
All those should get 1st priority and should get updated, enhanced to aim of prefection.
Other aircrafts then the F-16 should be a separated from BMS DEV team and should be created by âprivateâ pepole.
U3 could have being out long ago and with more features & updated.
This F-15 is taking to much energy from the DEV guys and delays other important things.Again, kudos to those great DEV team, but we can also share our thoughts.