A golden era ahead for BMS
-
@I-Hawk said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@Mike-0 said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
Everyone quoting me acting like I’m defending DCS or on their side, I’m not.
Don’t get too far with debates guys, it’s not worth it. You see how many DCS players are joining in yes? You will see many more when 4.38 will be released
Cheers!
Once 4.38 is out, the main things remaining in favor of DCS are the hi-fidelity Hornet+Carrier Ops and the volumetric clouds in the graphics department. If you could address those there would be no real competition for BMS anymore. Not that it matters (but still )
-
-
@Atlas yes, and you’re right in that we need DCS, IL-2, VTOL VR, even War Thunder for the community to stay viable as an industry, especially peripherals. I just don’t like the DCs business model, but I truly hope that if it is Nick Grey personally keeping it afloat, he is able to without burning the 3rd Party developers. I hope they learned VEAO Hawk debacle and have some kind of support to allow unsupported modules to work through later updates, but I don’t know how they can do that legally/financially.
But I really want to remind everyone here, DCS doesn’t really “freaking” matter to us. BMS is its own thing. Yes, comparisons are always going to be made. We will get some flow through of users that maybe do the War Thunder->DCS->BMS transition(s) that I’m seeing with my students that are young flight sim enthusiasts, which is always nice to have fresh blood, but BMS will continue to walk its own path regardless of ED.
-
@Snake122
Yes, thankfully we can say that BMS is independent of DCS or any other sim for that matter. I wish them all the best and it seems that they will need it much more than the BMS devs, which is another thing I am thankful for. -
@Atlas said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
War Thunder, VTOL VR, MSFS, XP, CAP2, EECH/EEAH…
! EEAH/EECH ! With allmods it’s BMS of coffee grinders ️
-
well we r over simplifying things…
DCS is a respected company with very good results. As much as I don’t like DCS and I tease - poke them all the time and I like it this is because I’m a satyr.
As I always say there is no actual comparison between DCS and BMS.
Yes they are on the same category GAME war flight sim and it’s easy to start point by point comparison.
BUT
DCS is a commercial company.
BMS is a company of friends for free.and this means BMS doesn’t care what DCS does to see them as direct competition. Even though some members might see it that way and maybe even act such well we all are errors making humans. It’s a human behavior. As a whole though BMS works way differently than a commercial company would do. The general rule is that each works on what he loves - likes.
Now if ppl and understand and comprehend this then whatever they say about comparing DCS and BMS are out of context and what they say makes no sense.
Both have their good and bad.
What BMS has good we say yea but see DCS doesn’t have it. and vice versa with the old lady with no teeth as BMS was described cause of lack of gfx.
bms are elitist bastards that play it hardcore and above all…
DCS is a censorship machine when you criticize them…
On DCS plus vote they delivered a single variant of F-16 in a considerable small amount of time… small cause if you take a look at BMS time still things are added for the F-16, well for all the F-16 variants but hey it’s 26 years of development and still adding, and have more to add??? yea it’s called free time. You see with this last how easy is to get in to a direct comparison.And all those stupid and wonderful things being recycled over the decades of both BMS and DCS.
Thankfully both have their maturity and focus.
Things go sideways some times, recent example on ED and the many times that BMS team of falcon team was dead and non existing anymore… etc etc…
Those will come again and again as users and circumstances bring them up…Users will continue with the no sense and base comparison as always…
The end point is user experience. in personal level do you enjoy it? either BMS or DCS well enjoy it and don’t make it a Jihad… there is no point. U r eager for features??? well don’t go Jihad up your sleeves and actively join the effort.
So as the thread tittle says yes it’s a golden era for BMS as it was always from the very beginning only this time in my personal opinion it’s more bright as more things get addressed, new members with full passion and love are added and bring magic with new features and address issues of the past.
That’s all from a former bms dev team member.
-
@MaxWaldorf said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@VIPER-0 said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
Our community sleeps completely peacefully
Sleep? I don’t have time to sleep!
-
@Mike-0 said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@TED said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@Ollie22 I think after 4.38 bms will win out in the looks too.
I’d be surprised if we can actually “win out” over DCS in terms of looks, we have a long way to go there with lighting, clouds and other things, but what we will have is “good enough” graphics paired with all the other things that BMS does so incredibly well!! Doubt DCS will ever have AI, ATC or a campaign like we have.
I mean heck, the theaters we have in BMS absolutely dwarf even the biggest maps in DCS, so expecting the same or better quality there was always gonna be a stretch, and I’m more than happy to compromise on a bit of eyecandy for that!
The so far released images about 4.38 suggest me that MANY 3rd party theaters will be released in the same time with 4.38. Which are far larger can Korea ATM as I can recall.
BTW you do not need a larger theater than what Korea has. If you check the boundary edges of the map you can see that it is VERY large. Just the most of action in the stock theater is happens is a 200x300 km size region or even smaller. But in fact the map is far, far larger than this. For a sim where tactical fighters are the main actors you simply do not need a larger theater than this.
-
@molnibalage said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@Mike-0 said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@TED said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@Ollie22 I think after 4.38 bms will win out in the looks too.
I’d be surprised if we can actually “win out” over DCS in terms of looks, we have a long way to go there with lighting, clouds and other things, but what we will have is “good enough” graphics paired with all the other things that BMS does so incredibly well!! Doubt DCS will ever have AI, ATC or a campaign like we have.
I mean heck, the theaters we have in BMS absolutely dwarf even the biggest maps in DCS, so expecting the same or better quality there was always gonna be a stretch, and I’m more than happy to compromise on a bit of eyecandy for that!
The so far released images about 4.38 suggest me that MANY 3rd party theaters will be released in the same time with 4.38. Which are far larger can Korea ATM as I can recall.
BTW you do not need a larger theater than what Korea has. If you check the boundary edges of the map you can see that it is VERY large. Just the most of action in the stock theater is happens is a 200x300 km size region or even smaller. But in fact the map is far, far larger than this. For a sim where tactical fighters are the main actors you simply do not need a larger theater than this.
I believe they have said 3rd party theatre builders will have to wait for release of 4.38 before they will get access. So it will be long wait for theatres other than the official 4.
-
@Icarus said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@molnibalage said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@Mike-0 said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@TED said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@Ollie22 I think after 4.38 bms will win out in the looks too.
I’d be surprised if we can actually “win out” over DCS in terms of looks, we have a long way to go there with lighting, clouds and other things, but what we will have is “good enough” graphics paired with all the other things that BMS does so incredibly well!! Doubt DCS will ever have AI, ATC or a campaign like we have.
I mean heck, the theaters we have in BMS absolutely dwarf even the biggest maps in DCS, so expecting the same or better quality there was always gonna be a stretch, and I’m more than happy to compromise on a bit of eyecandy for that!
The so far released images about 4.38 suggest me that MANY 3rd party theaters will be released in the same time with 4.38. Which are far larger can Korea ATM as I can recall.
BTW you do not need a larger theater than what Korea has. If you check the boundary edges of the map you can see that it is VERY large. Just the most of action in the stock theater is happens is a 200x300 km size region or even smaller. But in fact the map is far, far larger than this. For a sim where tactical fighters are the main actors you simply do not need a larger theater than this.
I believe they have said 3rd party theatre builders will have to wait for release of 4.38 before they will get access. So it will be long wait for theatres other than the official 4.
Here you can see om the latest screenshots that many of them is not Korea and it is 100%.
Korea does not have any kind of desert and high cliffs near to any coastline.
https://forum.falcon-bms.com/topic/25373/4-38-screenshots/21 -
@molnibalage said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@Mike-0 said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@TED said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@Ollie22 I think after 4.38 bms will win out in the looks too.
I’d be surprised if we can actually “win out” over DCS in terms of looks, we have a long way to go there with lighting, clouds and other things, but what we will have is “good enough” graphics paired with all the other things that BMS does so incredibly well!! Doubt DCS will ever have AI, ATC or a campaign like we have.
I mean heck, the theaters we have in BMS absolutely dwarf even the biggest maps in DCS, so expecting the same or better quality there was always gonna be a stretch, and I’m more than happy to compromise on a bit of eyecandy for that!
The so far released images about 4.38 suggest me that MANY 3rd party theaters will be released in the same time with 4.38. Which are far larger can Korea ATM as I can recall.
BTW you do not need a larger theater than what Korea has. If you check the boundary edges of the map you can see that it is VERY large. Just the most of action in the stock theater is happens is a 200x300 km size region or even smaller. But in fact the map is far, far larger than this. For a sim where tactical fighters are the main actors you simply do not need a larger theater than this.
Applying the 555x555 nm size what I could measure on Korea interactive map.
Even war a Cold War theater would be suitable with a small fantasy if we wish to add at lest on airbase on the edge of UK. Of course some of longer range sq. also should be closer what was in RL in Poland but this is fine for a really large campaign.
-
Applying the 555x555 nm size what I could measure on Korea interactive map.
Close a 64seg theater with 16 tiles = 1024 × 1024 cause tiles are 1x1km
-
@molnibalage Thats because 4.38 will release with 4 theatres. Balkans KTO ITO and CET. At least that’s what they have said they are doing. Israel certainly has desert. They have also said 3rd party don’t get access until after release and expect long waits for their theatres . Wish I could direct you to the thread but I cant find it.
-
@molnibalage only official BMS supported theaters might be ready by release of 4.38 but not sure
-
@MaxWaldorf said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
@molnibalage only official BMS supported theaters might be ready by release of 4.38 but not sure
Thx. the quick reply.
-
With all this well deserved attention, do you think Falcon 4 will stay cheap for long? (because is not free) I don’t think so. But it won’t be as expensive to fly as the other sims.
-
@Dex0Punk said in A golden era ahead for BMS:
With all this well deserved attention, do you think Falcon 4 will stay cheap for long? (because is not free) I don’t think so. But it won’t be as expensive to fly as the other sims.
Yes. No matter how we love BMS4 we are not speaking about millions of users. F4.0 is a retro game, its price it set according to this. No matter the BMS4.38 or any other BMS. It would be VERY strange to set up 60 EUR price as for a AAA game or even just 30 EUR (indie level) just because of BMS. BMS4 exist since 2011, and Falcon 4.0 only became cheaper and it is many times in sold in bundle with the F3.0 and Falcon AT.
For only 10 EUR… -
@Ollie22 Good AI is just the tip of the ice berg. It’s how everything that exists integrate so nicely with everything. From mission planning and package setup to how it actually plays out with ATC and AI flights.
It’s beautiful.Yesterday during a flight I could hear how the flight lead (AI) was instructing his flight to line up in a specific patter, they took off, was handed off from the tower and formed up and started their flight over to the AO.
-
@Arty I’m wondering if my current rig will be able to handle 4.38 in VR at an acceptable frame rate, I haven’t tried 4.37 VR yet as I have just about got my VR headset (Quest 2). I want to stick with my rig at least another year or 2. I still have my TrackIR though in case it doesn’t work out
-
I cannot wait for 4.38. Built a new pc (7950x3d + 4090) so all i can say is bring it on!