Link 16 things you want in the next update
-
even i set it to 2000 feet. it’s still not enough.
In the real world, The legality should be at least three football fields.At least 900 feet? What is the maximum?
-
SAMs fire ballistically (no guidance) when overwhelmed/no fire control radar.
Decoy drones. -
You can control how big the dispersion for a CBU is by releasing at a higher or lower altitude.
Is releasing altitude related to dispersion of CBU? if i drop CBU over 30000 feet, bigger dispersion?
-
Is releasing altitude related to dispersion of CBU? if i drop CBU over 30000 feet, bigger dispersion?
I would say it makes 0 difference what altitude you drop them from, its BA that opens them up and that’s what I believe Stevie was referring to?
-
I would say it makes 0 difference what altitude you drop them from, its BA that opens them up and that’s what I believe Stevie was referring to?
I think so , But the BA i set to 2000 still doesn’t have a good effect like it in the real world.
-
I think so , But the BA i set to 2000 still doesn’t have a good effect like it in the real world.
Try 2500… ?
-
GCI / AWACS should periodically auto-update the picture. Currently, you have to keep asking for picture from GCI in order to get presentation or position updates.
If there is a possibility, we could add an option in AWACS Menu, i.e. “Judy” in order to silence GCI updates once we are targated at this group.
-
GCI / AWACS should periodically auto-update the picture. Currently, you have to keep asking for picture from GCI in order to get presentation or position updates.
If there is a possibility, we could add an option in AWACS Menu, i.e. “Judy” in order to silence GCI updates once we are targated at this group.
I think we don’t want C2 to call NEW PICTURE during committing to the groups…
So requesting a picture for updates is okay. -
GCI / AWACS should periodically auto-update the picture. Currently, you have to keep asking for picture from GCI in order to get presentation or position updates.
If there is a possibility, we could add an option in AWACS Menu, i.e. “Judy” in order to silence GCI updates once we are targated at this group.
Eh, the issue with that it could excessively clutter comms in larger MP packages, if anything add a server-side config setting for it.
-
F-16A accurate cockpit, F-16D accurate model with second pilot being active (by human), better F-15E/C cockpits
-
F-16A pit is in the works bt Rypley, I hope once it’ll be ready there’ll be eough motivation to tackle the avionics of early Vipers.
-
Would really like an F-111.
-
IFF.
-
I’d like to see a TGP Mfd enhanced with a better constrast display for IR …where the ground heat could perturbate the IR sensor…
so I 'd like the temperature of environment can be taken into account and modify the capability to detect a hot body -
ERS A-A radar mode for HAF F-16 block52+ and block52M models.
-
:uham::uham:
-
-
Would really like an F-111.
F-111F is my favorite jet but is so far from what the current engine can model.
The plane simply had very old avionics and only in post Cold War era got MFD. And the two manned crew…The mentioned F-16A is my wet dream.
-
I just mean in the game at all for AI. I don’t care if it’s -16 pit.
-
F-16A pit is in the works bt Rypley, I hope once it’ll be ready there’ll be eough motivation to tackle the avionics of early Vipers.
you can bit that there will be since desert storm is being developed to a great extent by SpGoro et al