3DPIT WISHLIST
-
Eurofighter forever……
-
I voted Rafale
-
1/ F-16A
2/ F117
3/ EF2000 -
Don’t say you wouldn’t fly it!
Tj
-
We should have added to the list also the F-16 block 60 and the near-future USAF upgraded F-16’s with the CPD monitor…
-
Is there Block 60 in DB…? Most of features of Block 60 cannot be modeled, IMHO therefore it is pointless. You cannot model towed decoy, IRST, AESA radar. The more advaced ECM can be but I have never met any person who know how it works the ECM strenght value. You can increase the effectivness of ECM but only feedback what you can get if you tests it ingame.
I have to say I do understand why so many people wish to see AC which are not suitable for the engine while there are so many which are fit into Falcon universe quite well.
-
Is there Block 60 in DB…? Most of features of Block 60 cannot be modeled, IMHO therefore it is pointless. You cannot model towed decoy, IRST, AESA radar. The more advaced ECM can be but I have never met any person who know how it works the ECM strenght value. You can increase the effectivness of ECM but only feedback what you can get if you tests it ingame.
I think it was sarcasm. Wasn’t it?
I have to say I do understand why so many people wish to see AC which are not suitable for the engine while there are so many which are fit into Falcon universe quite well.
You do?
I have to say I’m a bit disappointed with the result of this poll. Seriously? F-15E? Rafale?! EF-2000?!
-
I have to say I do understand why so many people wish to see AC which are not suitable for the engine while there are so many which are fit into Falcon universe quite well.
I have to say I do understand why so many people wish see new funcion-switches that need a lot of code-work (mounth if not years) when the community have a lot of modelers, graphics and talented (and motivated) guys that want to still alive the “falcon” world… bah… each one have his opinion…
-
Voted F16A
-
I think it was sarcasm. Wasn’t it?
Which comment? Mine or Raptor’s? Mine was not sarcastic.
-
Not yours, his comment. I agree with you on this subject.
-
to paraphrase the Rolling Stones " you can’t always get what you want" !: reading the title of the thread does not mean he will make the most desired…
-
to paraphrase the Rolling Stones “you can’t always get what you want”
Yeah, I know…
but EF-2000?;) -
Most of features of Block 60 cannot be modeled
That’s why we vote for 3D cockpit, wich are graphics not Features ^^
Unless I misunderstood what you mean ?
I find it awesome how the fight is on between the Rafale and the Eurofighter !
It’s like a football game for me lol -
What I don’t understand is why the rafale was included or considered. Didn’t someone try this before and was discouraged because of some legal shit or something. And that was just for the 3D model if I recall now we want a cockpit? If we couldn’t have a 3D model why would we be able to include a pit?
-
What I don’t understand is why the rafale was included or considered. Didn’t someone try this before and was discouraged because of some legal shit or something. And that was just for the 3D model if I recall now we want a cockpit? If we couldn’t have a 3D model why would we be able to include a pit?
we always want what we cannot have
on that note, F-14! F-14! F-14!
-
we always want what we cannot have
on that note, F-14! F-14! F-14!
I agree with you. If you look at the Database then look at what we are offered right now “Stock” KTO Forget all these add-on theaters and mods.
The
F-15C
F-15E
F-5
A-10Are the only aircraft on that list that don’t need to be manually added to the campaigns. Therefore those in my opinion should be done first. Although At this point I would like to see a EF2000 the most and then the F-15C
P.S The Eagles are the only ones on that list besides JanHas F16’s that don’t need a complete overhaul on the model as well. Seems like more work than pits will be needed on a majority of these planes
-
I’ve opened this thread only to understand what’s the wish… don’t worry about AC models or skin… or features… devs already working on…
On my side, I found strange why most of you dont start to learn how to build a new AC model, a new skin or a new "features, instead to talk about it
most of devs are started to write His “falcon-story” in this way
mine would be an encouragement, not a “sarcastic” post
-
voted days ago: F16A + F15E
too bad I did not vote F5 or T50 or both too …
now they fall behind the other votestraining jet would be really nice sometimes
oh yes - thank you very much qawa for pitworking
-
On my side, I found strange why most of you dont start to learn how to build a new AC model, a new skin or a new "features, instead to talk about it
I have tried it about 5 years ago with XSI/3DS. I found too complicated, I was not able to create skin palette even for a very basic 3D model. Even if I have skills in 3DS I have no idea how should anything imported into Falcon. Making skin is another issues, it is rather than art than “technical” developing.
I have learned many things around DB and modeling and I do not have enough time even just for modding. I do not have hundreds or thousands hours to learn something besides my RL. From my aspect now new 3D models what are really needed for Falcon. Of course I can live with new cocpits and 3D models but this in not mine 1st priority.