WIP: T-14 Armata
-
Great Eghi!
-
Haha, the man is on real fire…
Great Arek, BRAVO!!!
Keep on them.
Nikos. -
-
Interesting choice…
-
Great!
-
:eek:
-
Which tanks should be replaced and what stat should get this new tank? Regardless of years of tweaking I still do not get many times how any why used weapons 2D/3D world and how it works 2D stats…
Regardless I set same stat for A-10 & Su-25 and give the same weapons A-10 is a killer beast in 2D world while Su-25 is any impotent guy… How should be set this new tank…? -
Which tanks should be replaced and what stat should get this new tank?..How should be set this new tank…?
This is new model, not for replacement.
Stat/Set … I do not know, maybe like M1A1 or Leopard?
This is very low priority ATM. Maybe in the future will be released. -
This is new model, not for replacement.
Stat/Set … I do not know, maybe like M1A1 or Leopard?
This is very low priority ATM. Maybe in the future will be released.Are tons of garbage unit in DB, you do not have to create for a new one. But in this case stat should be changed just as way as you would set for a new unit. IMHO it is pointless to creat new DB entries as long as tons of garbage entries are waiting for recycle.
-
Very nice work EGHI. I have vision of a great tank battle in Korea 2012. The T-14 Armata will be the centrepiece.
-
-
Which are?
Which has * character in DB, they none of them used, not in campign not at all. Only in aircraft tab is about 30+…
Are tons of ground vehicles which are not used in any battalion or the battalion is not listed in TE…
I won’t list all of them are so many. Considering timeframe of Falcon all Vietnam era stuff on US side have olny one role, video and screen shot fun, nothing else.We are speaking in totaly 100-200 or more DB entires.
-
please molnibalage… One time shut up.
EGHI- master -
please molnibalage… One time shut up.
Let’s keep it civil gents.
Molnibalage is expressing an opinion which does have some merit, agree with it or not - all you have to do is look with the Editor to see what he is talking about.
And on the other hand, if Eghi wants to work on the T-14, let him be - one can think of a ton of scenario/theater where a modern Red tank might be useful.
So how about focusing on the (very nice, BTW ) artwork here.
-
please molnibalage… One time shut up.
EGHI- masterCan I ask why?
Adding T-14 is just as good idea as adding F-16E/F or F-35A… Or even worse because these are much more matured than Armata…
I simply forgot (neglected this) and I asked about the technical aspects of integration in case maybe somebody know anything about 2D modeling values…
Just a hint, Falcon is more than a bunch of 3D models…
Adding a new model considering it modeling and imact on tactical envrinoment is quite strange… -
should be nice to know how to delete that garbage from db or have a new one from scratch and add what you want\need.
Congratulations Eghi, new 3d is always welcome for me.
cheers
-
Will the systems be modelled, e.g. Protection systems, ATGM’s? Or is this just a model and the devs are going to code it?
-
Will the systems be modelled, e.g. Protection systems, ATGM’s? Or is this just a model and the devs are going to code it?
Falcon is not a land based simulator. Currently ATGMs are modeled as guns. It is possible to change to see ATGM in 3D world but their profile because of missile gudiance can’t be the RL and no ERA or any similar stuff can be modeled. I doubt that ever will. This is not Steel Beast and I doubt even SB is modeld such systems. Falcon uses a dmg. + dmg. type for wepaons and HP + dmg. resistance model for units.
-
I won’t list all of them are so many.
You should.
Indeed you should if you want to help us on that area rather than repeating endlessly the same statements almost every days. Energy could be (?) used in a more useful way.
-
You should.
Indeed you should if you want to help us on that area rather than repeating endlessly the same statements almost every days. Energy could be (?) used in a more useful way.
Now I have a request. As long as I did not have it seemed me pointless to make such list considering the impact of my suggestion thread…
I can make if you wish but you have to understand it will represent my aspect. Why does this mean?-
Except old weapons which were used in lots of countries all old other stuff should be recycled before mid '70s. They are simply out of timeframe. I mean MiG-21PF/MF with old R-3S (basic Atoll) can be kept because were used in WPACT, or course SA-2, SA-3 ect. also should be kept or T-55/62, etc. Keeping F-4B with AIM-9B is maybe pointless because of modeling limitation and era factor. F-4 variants can be exception because now we have good F-4 model consdering the currently used F-4 LODs. (The converted F-4 models with skins form FF.) But what about rest? F-105 (maybe except SEAD wihch were used by ANG up to mid '80s) , F-100 F-86, etc. they should not part of game. Bye-bye… They can’t be modeled well they do not have not any use in campaigns and TE.
-
I assign all trainer aircraft recycleable stuff. As long as Falcon does not support two seat cockpit control (pilot/WSO) and do not have cockpit their existance is pointless from my aspect. Their 3D models and skin are mostly LQ and does not have any real function.
-
Also should be considered what is the purpose of core DB. Should it provide DB more than one theater or only for KTO? Because in this case should be considered the main units of possible 3rd party theaters and reassing by that way the recycleable DB entries. Which are the most potential 3rd party theater? It depends who is asked…
-
What about subvariants? It is pointless to create tons of different tank 3D model what we cannot model well. Just think about how any T-64, T-72 and T-80 variant existed between 1960 and ~1995.
T-64, T-64A, T-64BM, T-64BV,
T-72, T-72A, T-72B, T-72B1, T-72B obr. 1987, T-72BU (T-90)
T-80, T-80A, T-80B, T-80BV, T-80U, T-80UM, T-80UKAnd these are only three different main MBT family of USSR. So you can see the magnitude of this issue.
How many of them should be modeling considering the limitation of modeling and absraction? Good question…
I can set up a conception but question is who can accept that?Same case for air defense or any othe unit class. For ex. there is difference between basic OSA and OSA-AKM. Here comes the era factor. In RL the AKM was the widely used variant as I know older OSAs were converted. (I have to ask Hpasp.)
Also another factor is the operator of the same unit. If you wish to see in a 3rd party theater both RSAF + USAF or JSDF + USAF F-15 you need different DB entries. You can put here any AC and countries who used the same hardware.
-
Etc.
Should I start making this list? Because it would be very time consuming and considering the goals of BMS4 Team… Is it worth to spend my free time working on this?
-