The future of BMS
-
Well, This post is kinda noob but, I want to share my opinion with all
So, We all know that Falcon 4 is 30 years old game that has faced many reworks mods(FF4, Allied force And BMS), But, The lack of tools for the engine will make it obsolete? Or it could be upgraded until it satisfies the the need of the consumer?, Of course i really want to see how BMS develop along the years and how it keep developing, So, My concern is the engine, Could tools be created to make it better or itās better create a new engine(I know how hard can that be)? iāll let you to answer me.
And well, The life of the project is an important fact, Because, BMS it what it is thanks to the dev and constant modding feedback, What BMS could be if thereās no entusiasm in BMS, Itāll be plain boring.
I really hope the modding community and the devs keep making the game better and better, But will be a point when upgrading the game makes no difference? i hope that point never arrives.
So, whatās your point of view about the future of BMS?
Iām curious about your POV, Let me know down there :p. -
Kind of post we see every two years, since 2004.
-
Kind of post we see every two years, since 2004.
About every 6 months you mean, last one started Jan 2018!!
C9
-
If the devs stopped today I would still have a wonderful sim to fly for years to come. Everything new we get is just bonus material IMOā¦but, they havenāt stopped and are working on a release of 4.34 in 3-4 weeks, so lets just see what they have in store for us, shall we?
-
-
Well, This post is kinda noob but, I want to share my opinion with all
So, We all know that Falcon 4 is 30 years old game that has faced many reworks mods(FF4, Allied force And BMS), But, The lack of tools for the engine will make it obsolete? Or it could be upgraded until it satisfies the the need of the consumer?, Of course i really want to see how BMS develop along the years and how it keep developing, So, My concern is the engine, Could tools be created to make it better or itās better create a new engine(I know how hard can that be)? iāll let you to answer me.
And well, The life of the project is an important fact, Because, BMS it what it is thanks to the dev and constant modding feedback, What BMS could be if thereās no entusiasm in BMS, Itāll be plain boring.
I really hope the modding community and the devs keep making the game better and better, But will be a point when upgrading the game makes no difference? i hope that point never arrives.
So, whatās your point of view about the future of BMS?
Iām curious about your POV, Let me know down there :p.The ETA to die for BMS is one day around the year 2132, confirmed. Before that iit is imposible, it will survive 2 nuclear wars and one zombie assault.
We only need to keep feeding the BMS code with some talented coders as the ones we have now, in fact there is a bankaccont when all falconers can deposit a small amount of money to improve the live and the heal of the current coders to make them happier and life longer.One thing that make the BMS coders live longer is do not get bad criticism opinions, I donĀ“t know how to describe the BAD CRITICISM in English, sorry, try always to be positive is the idea.
Get a powerful and wonderful 3D engine will not make BMS funnier, only BMS will need a powerful PC to run BMS to see the same pixels from FL300
-
The ETA to die for BMS is one day around the year 2132, confirmed. Before that iit is imposible, it will survive 2 nuclear wars and one zombie assault.
Yes, Hehe i hope i can live enough to learn about teather creation and make my very own Venezuela Vs USA or something like that.:p
-
30 years? You mean 20.
-
Falcon 4 was released 20 years ago, not 30 (like Planehazza said) and BMS has been in active development for many years, and there is no end in sight. You say you know how hard it would be to create a new game engine, but I do not believe you really understand what that involves. For example, many currently popular PC games with high level graphics use game engines produced by third parties ā ARK: Survival Evolved happens to use the Unreal 4 engine. A game company created a very high end game that pushes graphical limits of PCās, but they didnāt spend any time creating their own game engine because that would have increased the work load, cost of production, and time to develop to a degree that would not be profitable or successful.
Consider the amount of work the Falcon DEVās have put in over the years to bring this 1998 era PC game into the modern era. Look at the history of different Falcon mods, and the time table things were achieved on. Understand that creating a video game on a volunteer basis (unpaid coders) is a different thing than a for-profit company attempting to create a product for sale. A company would not have the latitude to take as long as they need to, would be subject to deadlines, and layoffās after release, bringing the team down to a few people left to patch and fix what had already been created, setting aside future content and upgrades. BMS Devs have the opportunity to move forward as they are ready, not as a market or CEO dictates, which means that BMS will remain for many years to come.
Read more about Falcon mods development over the years:
History of Falcon BMS and all falcon games since Falcon c. 1984 1999
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ac/Falcon-4-history.svgInterview with Falcon Dynamic Campaign Creator Kevin Klemmick c. 2011:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/lj6te3y3invfdd9/BMS%20History%20Interview%20with%20Falcon%20Dynamic%20Campaign%20Creator%20Kevin%20Klemmick.pdf?dl=0 -
Falcon BMS 5.0 will be awesome.
-
[Insert dead horse meme here]
-
Falcon BMS 5.0 will be awesome.
Iām sure it will be unfortunately, I will have been dead for 3-4 weeks.
-
Well, This post is kinda noob but, I want to share my opinion with all
So, We all know that Falcon 4 is 30 years old game that has faced many reworks mods(FF4, Allied force And BMS), But, The lack of tools for the engine will make it obsolete? Or it could be upgraded until it satisfies the the need of the consumer?, Of course i really want to see how BMS develop along the years and how it keep developing, So, My concern is the engine, Could tools be created to make it better or itās better create a new engine(I know how hard can that be)? iāll let you to answer me.
And well, The life of the project is an important fact, Because, BMS it what it is thanks to the dev and constant modding feedback, What BMS could be if thereās no entusiasm in BMS, Itāll be plain boring.
I really hope the modding community and the devs keep making the game better and better, But will be a point when upgrading the game makes no difference? i hope that point never arrives.
So, whatās your point of view about the future of BMS?
Iām curious about your POV, Let me know down there :p.The future of bms? Lmfao. You think as time passes and with dcs actually making the f16 and other planes fully functional that people will stick to a 20 year old game? Not saying its bad , but at its corrent state and age and with dcs having 1000 times better graphics and overall gameplaying experience , I donāt know who will actually keep falcon bms. It just got old. Graphics suck for 2018 and everyone needs to move on.
-
Falcon 4 was released 20 years ago, not 30 (like Planehazza said)
Rypley said it, Planehazza corrected!!! Gettinā old sucks!!!
C9
-
@Deathmaze:
The future of bms? Lmfao. You think as time passes and with dcs actually making the f16 and other planes fully functional that people will stick to a 20 year old game? Not saying its bad , but at its corrent state and age and with dcs having 1000 times better graphics and overall gameplaying experience , I donāt know who will actually keep falcon bms. It just got old. Graphics suck for 2018 and everyone needs to move on.
Man, maybe you should start first. If you do not like it fine, but it is not too polite towards the devs, who provided this sim upgrade free of charge to you. This thread is going to nowhere and I suggest to close it.
-
@ Deathmaze
We will all die of old age before DCS comes up with a Viper that comes close to BMS. Iām betting 5 more years before the Hornet comes close to the fidelity of the Viper.
That said, if you like the pretty stuff better, then why are you here trying to figure out the sim? :tjacked:
-
@Deathmaze:
I donāt know who will actually keep falcon bms. It just got old.
I will still be here if it is still going - Falcon has never had the best Graphics so what. Allied Force had terrible graphics for 2005 and still went and paid money for it LOL.
Have seen years of graphics and lighting effect updates to many games and sims and there is one constant - that is you donāt even notice it after about 2 weeks of going ohh ahh. -
@Deathmaze:
Not saying its bad , but at its corrent state and age and with dcs having 1000 times better graphics and overall gameplaying experience.
Man, maybe you should start first. If you do not like it fine, but it is not too polite towards the devs, who provided this sim upgrade free of charge to you. This thread is going to nowhere and I suggest to close it.
Did i say i dont like it? No. Infact i said the exact opposite LOL. I just stated some extra facts and i never wanted to sound like a hater you little kinky boy damn everyone hates hearing the truth lol
-
@ Deathmaze
We will all die of old age before DCS comes up with a Viper that comes close to BMS. Iām betting 5 more years before the Hornet comes close to the fidelity of the Viper.
That said, if you like the pretty stuff better, then why are you here trying to figure out the sim? :tjacked:
Someone else might do It faster and better than dcsā¦.you dont know what devs decide ātomorrowā to ācopyā dcs and make a whole new better game:D
-
Man, maybe you should start first. If you do not like it fine, but it is not too polite towards the devs, who provided this sim upgrade free of charge to you. This thread is going to nowhere and I suggest to close it.
Why close it? Dont like different opinions? Lol i see