4.37 killed the AMRAAM
-
@nighthawk2174
I may be mistaken, but as I read Mav-jp’s post above, that is the adjustment that is under development, to not see such large deviations. Probably by decreasing the variance of the error distribution (and perhaps the choice of distribution itself). -
WPN, I don’t want to highjack your thread, so please excuse this announcement…The OFMNevada 1.7, coming out very soon, has something a bit different in it. It will include the AIM-120D, stock, but will also include simple executables where you can remove it from the Theater if you like. We’re doing that in response to some feedback we got from Multiplayers.
I’m posting this here to invite all of you to check it out and give us your feedback, so we can continue to refine the missile. -
@drtbkj said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
It will include the AIM-120D, stock
Nice work, could u share aim120d data. I can compare it with other variants.
-
@nighthawk2174 - this is pretty much the sort of thing I was expecting based on previous commentary concerning the “improvements” to the model. I knew it was wrong then, and it’s wrong here…
…and I still feel the best solution is to return to the 4.35 model and just leave that alone.
-
2 weeks vacation. First and last warning from me. I-Hawk.
-
@Stevie I am not sure what is irony here, but please, have some consideration with MavJP work.
You may not like it, that is totally up to you. It may have some bugs, and some were acknowledged by the team, some stuff was fixed already and some stuff is being worked on. And some problems come from people PC.
MavJP has been working quite hard to deliver an experience which is based on data the team could gather. Telling him to dump everything sounds very disrespectful to me.
-
@Stevie luckily not every one thinks like you. Else we would have today the same simulator as twenty years ago.
Refining simulation, improve it, and in fact all things in general are a long process with their problems. But it’s the price to be paid if we want things to progress…
You know what? You are free to launch 4 35 and play with your arcade missile but let us experiment all these new things. Even if they are not yet perfect or with some bugs., we are able to enjoy it or to wait for their realisation and find some compromise the time needed.
-
@Stevie said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@Mav-jp - this is pretty laughable, really…
you can laugh as you wish
Enjoy your masturbation time
-
@Mav-jp said:
Enjoy your masturbation time.
I was just sitting here (bored) thinking: “What can I do now…?”
Stumble upon your post… BOOM…!
Great idea…!!
-
-
@white_fang @Aragorn
https://kommandostore.com/products/amraam-atamonica-bundleI also have the Aim-9 bundle and they are about to bring out a Paveway one. The A-10 one was pretty cool if you like the Hog, I couldn’t bring myself to spend that on it at the time (and B-2/F-117/AN-225). Hopefully he does a Viper eventually.
-
@Snake122 said:
I also have the Aim-9…
Is that a missile, or are you just happy to see…
Oh, wait…? You meant… My bad.
-
@Aragorn
Happy to see her:
https://kommandostore.com/products/aim-9-sidewinder-atamonica-bundle?_pos=5&_sid=28880eaf2&_ss=r
I’m more of a Aim-9 fan anyway:
Also no qualms about derailing this thread, I feel like right now there is nothing constructive going on. Maybe if/when TacView gets more accurate data to confirm we aren’t GIGO the whole situation. Yes, there is probably some ghost in the machine sometimes with AIM-120 but I trust @Mav-jp like all of BMS to have done his homework and if you don’t support a MPRF on a fighter sized target you can’t expect good PK.
-
@mack97 said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@drtbkj said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
It will include the AIM-120D, stock
Nice work, could u share aim120d data. I can compare it with other variants.
Hi, Mack. If you’re speaking of the misdata file, the latest is in OFMKTO 1.7.
-
Yuengling ! That stuff is tasty….
I think I have the exact same PC case… stenciling in some 20mm stuff is a neat idea……
@Snake122 said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@Aragorn
Happy to see her:
https://kommandostore.com/products/aim-9-sidewinder-atamonica-bundle?_pos=5&_sid=28880eaf2&_ss=r
I’m more of a Aim-9 fan anyway:
Also no qualms about derailing this thread, I feel like right now there is nothing constructive going on. Maybe if/when TacView gets more accurate data to confirm we aren’t GIGO the whole situation. Yes, there is probably some ghost in the machine sometimes with AIM-120 but I trust @Mav-jp like all of BMS to have done his homework and if you don’t support a MPRF on a fighter sized target you can’t expect good PK.
-
@mirv yeah I love the ammo can asthetic of the C70 even if it’s a little dated these days with case features. The stenciling felt like a good touch, thanks! Yuengling is a classic too! Here’s the other side with the AIM-120/9 stickers:
-
@Snake122 said:
Also no qualms about derailing this thread, I feel like right now there is nothing constructive going on.
That was the intent, old bean…
Dead horse flogged.
-
ICU !!!
btw taht’s the best lamp ever … ikea can go kiss ass -
@Snake122 That’s one bad-ass lamp, very nice
-
@drtbkj I’m all for it!!