Ff you could have one thing in the next update it would be…
-
or this:
Youth is wasted on the young
All the best, Uwe
-
Oh, it would be nice to get orbit and other external views when ejected. A fixed view is so very lonely.
I thought you could do that already? You can with FAF…you just use the camera views/controls.
-
This post is deleted! -
I don’t remember if this is actually modeled in BMS, but in real the tankers have a number of pumps forwarding fuel to the receivers, selectable by the boom operator, so depending the receiver aircraft it will make the refuel time shorter. Eg IIRC the -135 has 3; pumps, it can use simultaneously all 3 to push fuel to F-15 and F-22 airframes, but can only use 2; for the F-16 in order not to brake/damage (!) the internal fuel lines travelling fuel to the tanks. If anyone knows if these are accurate please share.
Did you had a look into : … :\Falcon BMS 4.3xx (Internal)\Docs\Operational Manuals
AIR-TO-AIR REFUELLING - ATP-56 (AJP 3.3.4.2).pdf
-
Nice profile pic DJ!
-
-
A new ranking and merit system for navy pilots would be nice
-
A good update would include HUD Only display with TrackIR and/or other head tracking devices. Happy New Year.
-
A good update would include HUD Only display with TrackIR and/or other head tracking devices. Happy New Year.
Have you tried the “Empty shell” ?
-
A good update would include HUD Only display with TrackIR and/or other head tracking devices. Happy New Year.
…plus Falcas has an add-on out there called SetHUDOnly for BMS -
-
A good update would include HUD Only display with TrackIR and/or other head tracking devices. Happy New Year.
Would a “HUD only” view with TIR still be a HUD only view?
What should you see when panning TIR around a “HUD only” view? Say you pan at 3oclock? Say you pan right under you?
How would you imagine such a HUD only view panning in three dimensions? Would that be acceptable and realistic?Obviously, the answer to these three questions lead to Deejay suggestion: it is the answer to your wish.
HUD only by name means HUD only
It’s IMHO something completely obsolete (my personnal opinion) and if it was to be made TIR compliant, then it should be in a Forward sector only to always have the HUD in view. otherwise the definition isn’t valid anymore
That would restrict TIR use anyway, so we’re back to square one.…plus Falcas has an add-on out there called SetHUDOnly for BMS -
That’s not TIR compliant, it’s just meant to relocate the HUD better
-
This post is deleted! -
Can?
-
-
Can?
Nuno Santos, who thank you for that post, made a wonderful Clouds Mod. Suggest you try there if you haven’t already.
-
[Hmm]… is it graphics?
Yes, it is. It’s coming FSX, P3D weather engine and weather texture addon.
You can have a look at the below web site and check what features it will bring in. -
Can?
Can? As in CAN it be made for BMS? Nope.
Great vid and excellent detail in regards to atmospheric and weather conditions. But there is no way that can be used for BMS. BMS is completely different from FSX or P3D. REX would have to make that work within the BMS engine. Think of several years for them to make something that could work with BMS. And REX has a large number of talented and full time working group. I know everyone would love to see this in BMS, but unless REX adapts or builds one, we will have to be happy with what we have. Besides, what we have isn’t so bad anyway. In fact, it has a lot going for it. In the future, there may be similar weather created for BMS with a higher GFX engine capable of reproducing those effects. Until then, I am happy with what we have:)
-
12:15 - AR door closing faster; than in current bms.
18:15 - Beautiful detail on how the wing vertexes are produced across wing under G increase
-
You can play with animRefuelRate and let us know of your findings
-
Vr…. and VR… oh VR would be cool also