4.37 killed the AMRAAM
-
@Foxtrot701 said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@Sandman If you want a high PK, you should probably switch to guns
Much more fun
-
So, did u1 improve things?
-
@Seifer Guidance seems a bit better, more reliable.
-
@Hubert3000 said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@Seifer Guidance seems a bit better, more reliable.
Only âa bitâ?
Internal tester BFM seniors saw massive improvements
-
BFM TV then. And they test BVR when they donât watch it.
-
@MaxWaldorf I agree with you âŠ
-
@LorikEolmin said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
BFM TV then. And they test BVR when they donât watch it.
I think you lost 100% of the non french populationâŠ
-
I donât have a problem with AMRAAMs not hitting anything at all, but with picking the wrong target.
I.e. when I launch two AMRAAMs in TTS at two MiG-21 (the two flying away from you in Instant Action wave 3, theyâre not that close to each other and donât maneuver at all until pitbull) from Rtr (17 NM or so), thereâs something like a 50% chance that the AMRAAMs actually hit both targets, in the other 50%, both missiles pick the same MiG.
I would need to test that a little more, itâs probably more than 50%, but often enough, it doesnât work as intended. I might also try if STT makes it better.
-
I am not sure that this is a âproblemââŠ
It depends on your radar, datalink and conditions on how missile head is trackingâŠ
I guess youâll have to anticipate that missiles are not magic anymore and learn to engage properly to make sure you can transform to the proper killâŠ
-
@Aragorn Me too, everyone knows they are rockets!
-
FYI the acquisition code has just slightly changed in one specific case (I doubt anyone will notice )
Thatâs not the acquisition that has been changed since there is no issue with it .
Thatâs the guidance laws that have been improved , in other words their trajectories , in particular the guidance is now making sure that the target wonât go outside gimbals when lead guidance
-
@sungad said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
I donât have a problem with AMRAAMs not hitting anything at all, but with picking the wrong target.
I.e. when I launch two AMRAAMs in TTS at two MiG-21 (the two flying away from you in Instant Action wave 3, theyâre not that close to each other and donât maneuver at all until pitbull) from Rtr (17 NM or so), thereâs something like a 50% chance that the AMRAAMs actually hit both targets, in the other 50%, both missiles pick the same MiG.
I would need to test that a little more, itâs probably more than 50%, but often enough, it doesnât work as intended. I might also try if STT makes it better.
Thatâs because you still donât accept that the target cue can be Miles away from the real target , and it also heavily dĂ©pendant of the distance between the target and the shooters radar. STT will be more accurate but still
-
@WPNS24 my AMRAAMs still killing itâŠ
-
@GhostDog-0 I donât know what this means? good or bad? sarcasm or not?
-
First time being able to fly update 1 and 1 mission and 4 slammer kills on a 21, 29 and 2 23âs. Seemed normal and have an ACMI as well, The slammers are back baby!!!
-
@WPNS24 i mean, my AMRAAMs are still able to lock and shoot down its target. No bugs
-
@GhostDog-0 Never said there were bugs but yes the slammers guidance seems much better now
-
@Mav-jp said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@sungad said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
I donât have a problem with AMRAAMs not hitting anything at all, but with picking the wrong target.
I.e. when I launch two AMRAAMs in TTS at two MiG-21 (the two flying away from you in Instant Action wave 3, theyâre not that close to each other and donât maneuver at all until pitbull) from Rtr (17 NM or so), thereâs something like a 50% chance that the AMRAAMs actually hit both targets, in the other 50%, both missiles pick the same MiG.
I would need to test that a little more, itâs probably more than 50%, but often enough, it doesnât work as intended. I might also try if STT makes it better.
Thatâs because you still donât accept that the target cue can be Miles away from the real target , and it also heavily dĂ©pendant of the distance between the target and the shooters radar. STT will be more accurate but still
Is that radar inaccurancy visible in the HUD? I always see TD boxes that are perfectly on target.
I mean, I probably know the answer: â4.38 will have inaccurate TD boxes and radar screens.â
-
This post is deleted! -
@sungad said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@Mav-jp said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
@sungad said in 4.37 killed the AMRAAM:
I donât have a problem with AMRAAMs not hitting anything at all, but with picking the wrong target.
I.e. when I launch two AMRAAMs in TTS at two MiG-21 (the two flying away from you in Instant Action wave 3, theyâre not that close to each other and donât maneuver at all until pitbull) from Rtr (17 NM or so), thereâs something like a 50% chance that the AMRAAMs actually hit both targets, in the other 50%, both missiles pick the same MiG.
I would need to test that a little more, itâs probably more than 50%, but often enough, it doesnât work as intended. I might also try if STT makes it better.
Thatâs because you still donât accept that the target cue can be Miles away from the real target , and it also heavily dĂ©pendant of the distance between the target and the shooters radar. STT will be more accurate but still
Is that radar inaccurancy visible in the HUD? I always see TD boxes that are perfectly on target.
I mean, I probably know the answer: â4.38 will have inaccurate TD boxes and radar screens.â
In BVR you see the TD box perfectly on a target, that you can not see (Beyond Visual Range). Thatâs exactly my kind of humor!