Link 16 things you want in the next update
-
Yeah. footage and videos are good and helpful for the “hype” and advertisement. But “Director’s cut”, “airshows” and “solo display” are not the main goal for BMS. So while it would be nice to have, to not hold your breath on it.
Maybe we have to learn, from DCS about this, we certainly prefer improving ATC, AWACS, AIs and stuff like this … Since we can’t make everything, we have to choose our priorities.As a video editor, not a problem. Beautiful shots and footage are just lucky opportunities in the way I see that; I try to capture or render all the hidden things that makes a flight worth it. Usually the ones you mentioned as priorities.
-
Better airbase textures (not the good ones already like osan, kusan), mainly at night, lighting and lights in general. Please, guys, BMS lighting is AWFUL!!! We need an update on this!! A realistic nightvision goggles and A NEW COCKPIT (not that the current isn’t cool, but it needs something to make it more immersive). The possibility of changing your view position in cockpit just like xplane and save it.
-
The possibility of changing your view position in cockpit just like xplane and save it.
What is the issue with position. It is exactly the right one to get it harmonized with HUD!
-
As a video editor, not a problem. Beautiful shots and footage are just lucky opportunities in the way I see that; I try to capture or render all the hidden things that makes a flight worth it. Usually the ones you mentioned as priorities.
I was editing videos of Falcon in the past, and im must disagree, its way harder in falcon to capture the moment or create good angels of shooting. i need special preperations for that and planing way deeper, then just go taping something randomly and getting excellent results anyway.
I believe falcon is way beyond one purpose sim, and be able to show others the best of it’s capabilities is basic (its really not about advertisment or those kind of stuff). Im not a coder, if i could create somthing like that, it would probably be the first thing ill do - maybe in the future.
-
@AsafBoy:
I was editing videos of Falcon in the past, and im must disagree, its way harder in falcon to capture the moment or create good angels of shooting. i need special preperations for that and planing way deeper, then just go taping something randomly and getting excellent results anyway.
I believe falcon is way beyond one purpose sim, and be able to show others the best of it’s capabilities is basic (its really not about advertisment or those kind of stuff). Im not a coder, if i could create somthing like that, it would probably be the first thing ill do - maybe in the future.
Misunderstood my point. Capture graphic moments and good angles of shooting = not my interest.
-
What is the issue with position. It is exactly the right one to get it harmonized with HUD!
Rotated about 10 degrees downwards, so the default view has the MFDs visible is a relatively common recurring request.
-
What is the issue with position. It is exactly the right one to get it harmonized with HUD!
Rotated about 10 degrees downwards, so the default view has the MFDs visible is a relatively common recurring request.
I wish this was a default view.
-
Please not!
You always can set that via TIR or any other headtracker to be the default position. But thats not the view, pilots use the most of the time, they look outside not inside. -
Well making videos is nice and having nice replay or if we could use acmi to record at what angle we like and look exactly as when we flew the mission but…
Let’s not go to the put the finger on the wound to believe or be amazed or compare.
Its just there as real as it gets, u don’t believe it, u loose.
Coders is way better to spend their coding time to evolve or implement new features that are core to the sim. Going fancy will draw back other thinks… rings a bell?
Sure we like the looks and sure they play around with those as they already have proven in many aspects.Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-T818A using Tapatalk
-
Please not!
You always can set that via TIR or any other headtracker to be the default position. But thats not the view, pilots use the most of the time, they look outside not inside.Real pilots have more peripheral vision, and they can glance down with their eyes to look into their cockpit (MFDs, instruments, …) though. In BMS, that’s not possible without moving your entire head, so having the option to choose whether you want your default to be the current view (focussed on outside) or the suggested view (focussed on HUD) would be very welcome for many, I think.
No idea what it’s like with other headtracking options, like EDTracker, OpenTrack etc., but what’s funny is that if BMS doesn’t find your TrackIR (not running, paused, or IR leds not in sensor view) and you press 3 for 3D cockpit, you already get the HUD-centered view, with the HUD centered in the middle and MFDs partially visible below. (I’m on a 1440p / FOV 95 though, so I see more than 1080p / FOV 80)
However, if you don’t press 3 after going from 2D to 3D, or as soon as BMS does find TrackIR and you press 3, or you recenter TrackIR, you get the horizon-centered view with the HUD slightly low, and MFDs and even the bottom part of the ICP out of view.HMCS actually shows this centering very well:
-
I see, maybe thats a compromiss, to be able to save a default view for ourselves.
A problem I have, is, that I always need to zoom out completely after joining 3D, to make the 3D HUD fit my cockpit. Would be nice to save the full zoomed out view as default as well. -
With all those AI improvements of 4.34 flying with them on the wing is great. I’d love to have the possibility to tell the wingman/element to “Anchor here”. Making them orbit at the current altitude around the current position.
What do you guys think?That’d be very useful. I didn’t see this but was thinking it the other day.
-
@Master:
More so than that, i would like to be able to tell other package flights to anchor at a certain place, for instance to allow sead escorts to clear the target area of sam’s before allowing the strikes to proceed, etc
That too.
-
Rotated about 10 degrees downwards, so the default view has the MFDs visible is a relatively common recurring request.
If you are using a TIR you can offset the view via pitch curves.
-
I’d really like to see a few key fixes.
- Landing gear wheels not rendering after retrarcted.
- Ground units drive on runway, taxiways. Perhaps use a trigger area for pathfinding logic for the AI or something similar.
- Fix AVTR Lighting Panel, needs indicator light too.
I’d also love to see the following new features
- 16x9 Menu Screens
- Multiple Kneeboards pages with key callbacks to cycle through multiple images for each kneeboard. This will allow Weapon Delivery Planner to upload all of it’s kneeboard pages.
- Block 60 and Block 70 F-16’s
- Simulation of Ground Forces Lasing targets on ground.
- Implementation of Secure Voice knob as configurable in-game private comms channel or Teamspeak Channel that can be set up via configurator utility.
- Implementation of Primary Console Lighting knob and the other unimplemented knobs on the Lighting Panel.
- Implement ECM features in a way that simulates behavior without revealing classified information on the systems.
- Implement KY 58 Panel and related features.
- Implement Anti-Ice Panel and related features.
-
Whats wrong with the AVTR Panel? Its correct for the blk50/52
-
More steerpoint lines available. Having ten instead of four will make it easier for any MC to build mission SA. Would also like to see the engine data for the RDAF F-16 be updated with the PW220 instead of the PW200. This was updated on all RDAF F-16 1½ years ago.
-
@NIL:
More steerpoint lines available. Having ten instead of four will make it easier for any MC to build mission SA. Would also like to see the engine data for the RDAF F-16 be updated with the PW220 instead of the PW200. This was updated on all RDAF F-16 1½ years ago.
That means more STPT than 99?
-
-
That means more STPT than 99?
No, steerpoint lines that you can put in when planning a mission. Marking a border, tanker track etc. Here seen as blue, green and yellow boxes.