Santa's wishlist for BMS
-
@cougar56th yes but it is available in HAF,THK,POLISH ,IAF and MLU 5 and above software it could be a very nice avionics addon for variants with new graphic engine. for BMS 4.38 via avionics configuration tool!
-
@Geraki I agree
-
ECHO-19 like collaboration for even more realistic Internal and external sounds for F-16
-
motion
-
Iām loving 4.37 but would love better support for triple screens (ie less distortion)
-
@Geraki
āInternal soundsā (important for realism and immersion) : What people donāt understand (especially if they newer flew in a fighter jet) is that what they hears on videos is NOT what the pilot hears.
This is a sound recorded from a plastic/metallic GP PRO that is not āwearingā (covered by) an helmet.A better way to understand it to listen the audio loop of the intercom rather than pure camera recording :
Actual physic reality of pilotās audio perception ā¦ or a kind of mix of both :
Also, what ppl donāt (or donāt want to) understand ā¦ what pilot hears in cockpit is more the pulsed air from the aircond system (ECS) and the airflow on canopy than the engine itself which is almost inaudible.
Please guys (3rd party Dev or even some internal Dev) ā¦ for the L.O.V.E. of the hardcore simulation, stop calling things ārealism modā when you donāt know what ārealisticā really really is.
ā¦
About external ā¦ BMS do not simulator the Doppler effect and sound attenuation with distance correctly. It is almost impossible to enhance the external sound and not possible to tune them without scrubbing some internal results.
Needs a new external sounds system first. If I set engine external sounds in a nice way for external views, inside cockpit, you will hear other a/c up to 10Nm * ā¦ and will mute suddenly in an extremely unrealistic way.- IRL it is no more than few meters.
Can you hear other jet on this video ? (direct cam recording) :
ā¦ do you think the pilot can ?
Just pay attention here, do we hear something from the leader while it is only few meters away (no sound change at 1:37 when leaderās AB goes off) ?
ā¦ no much more here :
We can only hear a difference a little bit when leader releases the breaks.ā¦
An interesting one :
We definitively here something when wingman is crossing the flight path of the leader ā¦ Do you think we hear the leaderās engine ? ā¦ nope.
What we hear it the engine airflow striking the canopy : -
Pilot ramp start animation while ramp start
-
@Dee-Jay said in Santaās wishlist for BMS:
āInternal soundsā (important for realism and immersion) : What ppl donāt understand (especially if they newer flew in a fighter jet) is that what they hear on videos is NOT what the pilot hears.
This is a sound recorded from a plastic/metallic GP PRO that is no wearing an helmetā¦This!!! Even in light general aviation airplanes we have this. We wear nice noise cancelling and passive hearing protection headsets to block out as much of the nosie that will damage your hearing, which is pretty damaged for me since one of my jobs I had the headsets off a lot.
I also remember the first time I heard a jet in the air, it happened to be an F-16 too. I was flying a glider at about 3000ā and heard the viper and started to panic because I figured if I could hear him he had to be close. Since the airport I flew at was under a MOA, I had a few close encounters with them before in airplanes but never heard them. I look all around in the glider donāt see anything and finally look up and see the F-16 about 5000ā above me, no danger at all. Gliders with no engine nosie and just air on the canopy are the only aircraft Iāve flown that I can hear other aircraft with any reliability and not need hearing protection to block out as much of the nosie as possible.
-
-
-
MFD Moving map
F-16D shared cockpit for training missions
Auto-GCAS -
The latest F-16V(block 70/72) Viper. Would be perfect for more modern missions with so many loadouts and features. Also the F-35A Lightning II mod that is still in development.
-
I wish an old school F-16A very dirtyā¦slick bombs, apg-66, only sidewinders
-
@tiag said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
I wish an old school F-16A very dirtyā¦slick bombs, apg-66, only sidewinders
Yeah! Real old-school flying.
-
@tiag
+1 youāre not the only one. Iāve tried to find some info on stores management display and equivalent of ICP keypad located on left console. You can find glimpse of S-M display on old promo videos. Iāve made some screenies. Unfortunately, aside from picture of said keypad and Function knob I couldnāt find any useful data.
I guess one may ask on f-16.net, such an old system shouldnāt be that secret. -
I am doing currently 1984 campaign in BalkansL theater. Modified F-16C block 25 with editor to have only 1984 weapons. It gets kind of boring a bit. Sparrows, Sidewinder, Mav, bombs and thatās it.
I thought it would be better but tis a bit boring IMO. Makes you appreciate the monster USAF block 50 I suppose my fav F-16. CFT block 70 no, too heavyā¦ -
@Hubert3000
Stop using sparrows and HSD 23 on your RWR should give you some shiver -
I thought the block 25 had Sparrow in '84 thatās the info Iāve seen. No? Yes 2 Floggers or Fulcrums is a handful lol. Mig-29A of course.
-
@tiag said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
I wish an old school F-16A very dirtyā¦slick bombs, apg-66, only sidewinders
Without the 100% accurate navigation, only INS, modeled INS drifting. No data link with accurate cockpit. My wet dreamā¦
-
There have been sources over the years but they are most likely wrong. People get confused by the word āprovisionsā. Sparrow wasnāt test flown and certified on the C until 1989 according to Lockheed M. F-16A ADF in 1989 really was the first.
Donāt let that stop you using it though.
-
@Hubert3000
As Migbuster said, there was only one Fox-1 capable variant and, introduced much later as Migbuster said and iirc it was never used outside US space.
Where blk25 may seem boring, blk15 would give you a hell of a thrill: less reliable nav system, less capable radar, no real MFDs, no HSD to keep your SAā¦
BTW isnāt '84 a bit to early for any F-16C at all? -
@Xeno Where that comes from usually is that first C was delivered in 84 to USAF and production started that year but donāt think they were really operational until a few years after that.