Santa's wishlist for BMS
-
@molnibalage
Cool to know, OTOH quite a few things that were written in RP5 manual weren’t exactly true, like IADS.@Aragorn said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
The entire premise of this thread is FLAWED.
Santa’s wishlist.
1.) WHY would Santa even NEED a wishlist…?!
2.) WHY would Santa fly BMS when he prolly flies the DCS Sleigh module…?
I don’t know what the average age of BMS use is, but whatever it is it’d be embarrassing to admin one believes in Santa in such age.
Unless we’re talking about average mental age including you dear 'Gorny, then we’re about five. So then it’d be fine
-
@Aragorn said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
The entire premise of this thread is FLAWED.
Santa’s wishlist.
1.) WHY would Santa even NEED a wishlist…?!
2.) WHY would Santa fly BMS when he prolly flies the DCS Sleigh module…?
And don’t ever think you’re quoting me just because there’s my face
-
@Xeno said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
@molnibalage
Cool to know, OTOH quite a few things that were written in RP5 manual weren’t exactly true, like IADS.The RCS works because I tried ages ago flying with F-22 against. It was a piece of cake to kill everybody. So the RCS works but maybe the aspect dependency not. It means only 25% difference as I can remember.
-
@Aragorn said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
2.) WHY would Santa fly BMS when he prolly flies the DCS Sleigh module…?
Because the Sleigh got him stuck in the last MP session and the reindeers are a paid addon…
Santa got tired of paying… so he is back to the good old BMS Sleigh… Might not be shiny but at least it flies and doesn’t require 10 addons
-
A functioning Rate-of-Turn Indicator.
Fast forward to 13:18 . . . .
-
Request return of the old style HSI option.
-
@Aragorn said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
The entire premise of this thread is FLAWED.
Santa’s wishlist.
1.) WHY would Santa even NEED a wishlist…?!
2.) WHY would Santa fly BMS when he prolly flies the DCS Sleigh module…?
Haha excellent
Here it goes
The ARCHITECT: Although, within the “PREMISE” there is the communities prime directive "TO WANT MORE " and within the context lies the definitive truth, that within the Falcon source code construct lays all our dreams and desires. Thus the community will comply with this process that results in a cataclysmic crash, crushing all who are connected to the code which coupled by the extermination of “ZION” our highest peak of euphoria will ultimately result in a fatal extinction of flight sim enthusiasts. Some say no we won’t let that happen, but the answer is; there are some levels of survive ability that has been accepted. However the relevant issue is whether anyone exploring is willing to accept the responsibility of the Falcon World as we know it. It has been interesting reading the reactions of many, as per Falcons predecessors, it was meant to create a profound attachment to the species of flight simmers extending the function of the reality, where others in the general world experience this through just a glance of imagination where in this community it is thus said la visa vi - “LOVE FOR FLIGHT” as one looks in the mirror. Therefore the dilemma presents itself, which brings us at last to the moment of truth the fundamental flaw is ultimately expressed and the anomaly revealed as both beginning and end. There are two doors, the first door is to comply and/or participate to achieve the “ZION” state we desire. The second door leads to the reality we don’t always get what we want being that Santa is more like a Satanic persona in the shadows and his fat and ugly and lies all the time, being the end of our species as adequately put. The problem is “CHOICE” but we already know what the community is going to do it’s within our own flaw. Already the chain reaction has begun the chemical precursors that signal the onset of an emotional desire for more beyond our capability specifically to over whelm our reasonable logic and good reason, an emotion that is already blinding from the single and obvious enough truth, that it has its own identity and there is nothing you can do to control it. Now, hope is the quintessential human delusion that simultaneously is the greatest source of a communities strength and greatest weakness. Thus said to meet again on the same premise initiates the prime directive to no end and its flaw of three points - the disappointment, complaint and the ban hammer.
youseewhatididthere~
P.S. I tried.
-
I. will… never. post. again.
-
Dear Santa, will it be possible to get manual/ training scripts (mission.txt files) to work with .tac as well as with .trn missions?
-
@Crassus sure in 3000-4000 weeks
jokes aside - as there’s no nothing “bad” in interactive learning , … and therefore idea is not bad also
we, well most of us here, (not beginners) , learned to learn the old way … read then try - it is a “freaking” simulator in the end … you won’t die if made a mistake
If you don’t succeed in first attempt , try again,- then after 1000 time you don’t succeed , … change of tactics , … what am I doing wrong-
you can’t be James Bond directly from the diapers … even He finished some education before entering Secret Service
-
so interactive for simulator is kinda simulator in simulator - I really find this overcomplicating
on the other hand - people will forget to read in the end (already in progress for a long time - rtfm case)
So !, Don’t forget to read, eh? - and most important of it all, don’t forget to be BRAVE , … I’ve destroyed a jet … NO , you destroyed a virtual jet and killed your virtual self in process , … but miraculously you live another day and can try again … a bit smarter… IF learned from previous mistakes
-
-
@vfp said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
this chinese page has bms 4.37 leaked photo? is this legit photo or photoshop?
https://www.bilibili.com/read/cv16379429One can hope And I do hope it’s stellar!
-
@b0bl00i How about a block 50 F16 XL so we can supercruise I know the USAF went with with the F15E you still could build one this is a simulation?
-
More tutorials, docs and good exemples for editing/activate mod, skin, textures.
Step by step to be sure to do nothing wrongI wish to help BMS team but i don’t have experience in codes and other… But i can work on a NOOB MANUAL for BMS Community and translate some docs in french. (i can have help on my work too)
Thank you Santa !
-
“True” A-10C Cockpit (not A10-A)
Graphicaly improved F-18C Cockpit
Graphicaly improved F-15 Cockpit
F-16E/F/V (Block 60/70/72) -
When assigning a Squadron to an airbase it drops the squadron icon right on top of the field. Sometimes difficult to see identifying info for the base or squadron. Airbases should be able to have multiple squadrons as in real life. The base size and facilities can determine how many squadron ‘slots’ are available. Should be able to ‘mouse-over’ the airbase to see the base identifier. Have the squadron symbol indicate one or more squadrons. Right-click to see a pop up list of squadrons and their aircraft types based at that airport. Same principle for aircraft carrier - multiple squadrons. So A6, F18C and F14 can all launch from the carrier.
-
I wish we had some more of the modern F-16 features like Link-16, missile warning systems and towed decoys, but I’d settle for just having an AWACs datalink like DCS. Its unpleasant fighting SU-35s and J-20’s without modern era upgrades.
-
@ZoneStalker995 said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
I wish we had some more of the modern F-16 features like Link-16, missile warning systems and towed decoys, but I’d settle for just having an AWACs datalink like DCS. Its unpleasant fighting SU-35s and J-20’s without modern era upgrades.
- You would certainly not be able to use L16 correctly because of its complexity.
- MWS do not work as you think.
- Towed decoys prevent hard manoeuvres.
-
@Dee-Jay said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
@ZoneStalker995 said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
I wish we had some more of the modern F-16 features like Link-16, missile warning systems and towed decoys, but I’d settle for just having an AWACs datalink like DCS. Its unpleasant fighting SU-35s and J-20’s without modern era upgrades.
- You would certainly not be able to use L16 correctly because of its complexity.
- MWS do not work as you think.
- Towed decoys prevent hard manoeuvres.
He never explained how works the MAWS.
-
@Dee-Jay Admittedly both MAWS and Towed decoys are better suited for ground threats but the point still stands that we aren’t flying with equivalent era equipment. And while I understand the difficulty and time needed, even a simplified modeling of these systems would objectively make this sim more fun and engaging to play with modern enemy threats.
-
@VDK said in Santa's wishlist for BMS:
A full dinamic campaign on EUROPE Theater 128x128!
That would be Santa and birthday together!!!