I am trying to talk to kronik about rolling credits.
I can unpack them with f4restool, but Re pack does not work.

I studied some old text from this and it mentions perl scripting for packing credits.
I’m not sure what I’m doing with perlscripting…, is there something I can add to f4restool to make perl script work?

Also how can I get ahold of kronik, f4restool creator …, who may have easy solution. Or anyone who has conquered rolling credits… please add some helpful hints here.,

Dear Manos,

already told or not, thanks a lot for your interest in making a new “Thud” at last - BMS sure deserved it.

And please take all the time you need for… good things never have been made with a simple snap (sorry, in Italian we can say this better :lol:). If I could help you in testing it, please count me in too since now!

With best regards,

I know, i know. I was saying that one if the nightmares of aligning with Falcon editor is the 1 degree constraing in rotation of features. Then i tried to explain my strategy to avoid those issues:

Making the whole objective into 3ds, so that everything fits nice when aligned, activate angle snap togle It to límit rotation to 1 degree, because i need to rotate my models to make a good hitbox, them export each feature and align everything back, which wont be so hard if i have done everything correctly. It is hard rock explain.

Still a little paind in the @ss but better so.

cellphone

Neat - another practical theater - well, if it still even exists.

I for one would love to see some experimental development made towards the HAL Tejas - I think it’s the most promising truly lightweight fighter out there right now. If India could manage to actually manage to get production rolling they might even export it…

And to the wise advise above please let me add mine:

just before attempting that, think about developing and refinining your attitude on throttle and stick, to avoid sudden movements on them and damaging your craft.

Think to what you would do if you would caress… a wild cat :lol:

Good luck! With best regards,

Nice[emoji3], thank you!

One thing is flying to fast, to many g. When dodging Sam can break ejector rack.
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?33727-Gripen-laser-guided-bombs-problem&p=470876&viewfull=1#post470876

@Airbuster:

For all the people that are working on theater development the biggest motivation for doing that is passion - doing something you enjoy in your free time. So convincing somebody to work for monetary gains using really old and in some way tedious processes to create something for your enjoyment is going to be a challenge (IMHO).

If you really want to see your vision realized in the Falcon World, you better start it yourself. Learn, do things, inspire other people and you may eventually find others who will help you because you share the same passion…

This is the most useful advice you can get. I recommend you to listen him Victorinox, you’ll see it will work.

For me Nordic is the most interesting area, perhaps because I live here and it is new campaign. Korea’s are great campaigns also but been doing them since the beginning so they are little bit worn out for me. Balkans look great, and feels great but always at some point of campaign I start to have crashes with it. Israel is also great but done it so many times, that sand is coming out of my ears and eyes…. 🙂

BTW I would not call it hack or fake if used for amphibious operation. (we are not mixing vehicle classes - APC is ground vehicle, castline hoovercraft can ba considered ground capable too…and these few landing crafts…they can even be static ships if desired…

But I was so happy with it, I did independent “shallow” route for gunboats, missileboats…upto corvette size. These were manageable, part of campaign, can take objectives. This could be considered “fake ot frankenstein”, but funny fake.

Just curious… In ‘Winter’ mode, is it easier to spot moving ground targets???

@starrats:

One “end if” for every “if” is what is noticed missing on 1 , 2, and 3

That and what was already mentioned on

End mission results are depending on specific event# to work.

I only knew this end mission thing recently, that’s why Nordic tri files don’t get a pilot record win if you win campaign. I have wrong event number go the job.

Thanks Starrats, sorry it got your attention, this piece of file is very old in my state of progression. I added a reply mentioning the endgame commands but the rest doesn’t resemble at all what I have in my current files. Thanks though 😃

EDIT: and by the way, not for 3.

for you superman…

Update: It seems to work exactly the same in stock Korea’s campaign, with ground based squadrons as well as carrier spawning with reinforcements on board. I’ll confess I’m using x64 to test that. I’m not sure it’s the reason why I need to save/load/save/load. But that works nice this way. Which also seems to fix that issue - I’m not using MC at all in the process:

https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?31962-Reinforcement-carrier-squadrons-aren-t-functional-before-MC-gets-in

As flying in BMS mostly implies saving and loading, this is not a problem to me. I wonder how 24 servers handle that. They may just reload when nobody’s up? Or do with appearing, but disabled, reinforcements? Curious about that.

Thanks for confirming that again, cougar56th! 🙂

All links are outdate 😞

You can set unit types for scrambling to have very limited role scores. Activate the rest of the fighters from reserve when you want the war to start for real.

Well it must be in the hotlist.

Στάλθηκε από το MI 5 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk

Thanks man, you’re literally the most helpful person around here… I don’t have all the videos ready and I don’t want to ask you to convert them all for me anyways. Just watching you convert the sample vid would be nice, and wastes the least amount of your time.

But someone around here must know how BMS works and what it requires. Someone who has actually transcoded a video for BMS before. Please, 😄

Dear theater developers,

For the benefit of end users please take a note of this:
https://www.benchmarksims.org/forum/showthread.php?32085-HELP-697th-Fighter-Squadron-MiG-29A-issue&p=451778&viewfull=1#post451778