Thanks for sharing.
That’s closely keeping up with current events.
No more Korea~~
😊 😊 😊

@Vespa said in Saitek or thrust master?:

@drtbkj i read a bit. It looks like fun !
for the moment VA don’t recognize my Hotas. perhaps cause TARGET still be install.
i try tomorrow and i come back to tell you what 😉

Vespa, I can’t help you with TARGET, but here’s something you can try. When you click on the 3-dor icon to the right of “when I press this button”, you get…
d6fd5180-5a96-41e8-9b7f-7baa21b05a0f-image.png

When you then push the desired HOTAS key you get…

3485703f-0cc9-4a1c-b97c-c924a3fb0d68-image.png

Then just do the Oks and Applies and you’re done. However, if it doesn’t instantly recognize the button, hit the blue reset button and try again. Sometimes VA doesn’t seem to “see it” on the first try.

Just to make it official……

The F-16 is approved for RNAV 2 and BRNAV for enroute navigation IAW with advisory circular (AC) 90-108 change 1, Use of Suitable Area Navigation (RNAV) Systems on Conventional Routes and Procedures and international civil aviation organization (ICAO) Doc 7300, Convention on International Civil Aviation. RNAV waypoints, routes and NAVAIDs must be pulled from a valid and certified database, e.g., Digital Aeronautical Flight Information File, by name. Terminal area RNAV procedures, (RNAV approaches, missed approaches, arrivals and departures) are not authorized until such a time as the procedure in its entirety can be pulled by name from an approved database and auto sequenced during the procedure.)

@airtex2019 yeah,thats it,pretty sure i read something about trying +4 or -4 so uhf would sound more to the left and vhf more to the right.
I assume it meant left and right speaker effect.
Scince i put it back to 0 ,no problem with sound stopping so far.

@ericfa2a said in How do you deal a fight against a J-20 in a f16 ?:

If we take Top Gun Maverick as reference, it’s true that there are some mistakes in BMS database :).

That is on point!

@Icer said in How to remove J-20 from the campaign:

@nuNce said in How to remove J-20 from the campaign:

Hello, I’ve recently noticed that the J-20 has appeared in my KTO Rolling Tiger campaign. I tried removing it with Mission Commander by changing my savegame, but without any luck unfortunately.
f6a254a-6e2a-4ae3-bbae-540132bc3e17-immagine.png](https://i.imgur.com/j6erWMq.png)
Is there a way to remove the J-20 without restarting the whole operation?
Personally it’s not a welcome addition as it disrupts the normal flow of campaigns in a frustrating manner. Thank you.

Where did you find a KTO Rolling Tiger campaign? I only have Tiger Spirit and Rolling Fire…?

Obviously I made up a new campaign title. 🙂
It’s Rolling Fire.

@Doc0301 i check the briefing and the acmi again and i found that the uhf frequency of the tanker is the one on the ground.The airborane tanker is another one. Poblem solved, thanks a lot!

@Miek said in F14 Tomcat Mod:

@drtbkj Hi hi, I did as you said I should, but I just want to make sure, the f14 cockpit is still the f18’s cockpit? I just want to make sure that i followed the steps correctly. Or is the new cockpit like the real f14’s cockpit? Thanks again for your help!!

Hi, Miek, yes , it should be the Hornet pit, The reason we do that or the Viper pit is because the stock pits are austere

@Badger Many thanks for the advice, that’s very useful. Will give it a go.

SOLVED: Use syntax: “set g_nButtonsPerDevice 128” - works a treat!

Boy there is a lot to learn… Probably about as much to learn as the real thing!

@Obi1 said in Aircraft campaign role:

@molnibalage Okay thanks! Just thought Mission capability file/settings for aircraft where used mainly. Also the main role setting in Editor. But it makes sense that squadron role setting also makes a difference to ATO planning.

In my MOD if you set SEAD role score for a J-5 or J-6 they could fly even SEAD with RBK (CBU) bombs depending on this setting. As I can remember only sq. with AG specialization could fly, the sq. with general mostly do not, they prefer rather fly OCA, strike of CAS/Int.

@danster said in TGP in SEAD/DEAD:

@drtbkj

But then again what about the strict no strafing advice…😊

As the poet said" it’s time to get medieval, I’m going in for Guns" . It’s fun, but can be hazardous to your health 😉

@mj3437 @GhostDog-0

Oh, I see. So that’s what the “Campaigns 0/0/0” category in the logbook means.

And there I was, thinking things were going well, with my forces moving North quite nicely.

Ah well, back to the drawing board, I’ll never make Major at this rate 😧

Thank lads,

Bayonet.

@vAiCon Is it not possible the create a short programme who doing the procedure to activate it ? (for some kind of poeple who afraid to change something in BMS manually ?) i just lunch the idea if it’s not, it’s not xD

@SemlerPDX I get it now!

Thank you my friend!

@MrSquee said in Fifth Generation Cockpit, Requesting Help:

@drtbkj how do i get this into my game?

MrSquee, go to https://www.mediafire.com/folder/s8rh0djrr3j3n/BMS+4.35-4.36+Data+Files , choose your jet(current choices are F-35 B and C) , and install the Files. . However, should you want them in another jet, go here- https://www.mediafire.com/file/5qjvs9l5y9p9c1y/BMS_Fighters_Manual_%25282%2529.pdf/file and the instructions are in Section VII

@ericfa2a My favorite is “Checklist complete” while check-in to AWACS 😄 You can switch your voice in setting and it will affect even your wingmen.

Addional info to Kolbes solution: the right side is empty as a placeholder for new checklists.

@CaptCanada said in WDP startup order:

HI all

Also, how can I have WDP running on a second monitor and Falcon BMS on the primary monitor? Is this how most folks here have it setup?

Cheers

Hi, Cap, Yes, and I do that routinely. I have to “crop” the display to get it to fit the secondary monitor, but once it’s there you are good to go

@AviationPlus said in Debug Data from Nose Wheel issue:

@Mav-jp Alright. But it happened the very minute my gear disappeared.

Yes but unrelated ,

@FreqiMANN

Well… I actually didn’t.

What I tried to express was a thought, or a suspect, more exactly.

A little clarification here by the devs. wouldn’t hurt, I think, if they would.
But it’s not worth of solicitating that. We are left free to keep on testing and experimenting all what we need or feel useful… isn’t it fun?

With best regards.