@regev said in New 4.36 SUFA weapon ?:

My favorite aircraft now got a new weapon ?

Anyone knows what is this type of weapon ?

100.jpg

Infos will be added to the Dash-34 in U1

Unfortunately this IMMIDIATELY started fucking with my BMS. so this is not an option for me. I’ll just use the keybinds for now.
Thanks anyway

@icer, @CriticalMass Could you guys post a picture of the AB IDLE part of AL section 2.19. Here’s mine.8b3edb93-b276-4628-aed0-11a12748bca5-image.png

Dear All.
I found this wird texture in the loadout window of the Training Mission 06_ILS_Weather. Hope this may be useful to developers.
Regards.
75bd7e66-0ecf-474a-89cc-b61c50da794f-imagen.png

@Atlas

Yes, that’s what I would have thought.

@AlehandroGTI said in Electronic Flight Bag:

hello, how can the flight info section be more self-compiled based on the mission you are carrying out?

I use it in conjunction with WDP which does exactly what you describe.
So in the end I have the kneeboard pages created by WDP and the EFB from @EuKeule on my tablet. That works just fine.

@Mav-jp

We’re slowly getting familiar with the new missile behavior. However sometimes we see things in the ACMI that doesn’t seem to be right to our eyes.
Here are two things that happened just recently. Maybe you can have a look give us some feedback.

AIM-120C5 going after wrong targets:
We had a range presentation of 2x2 Mig-29. Jaguar51 picked up both contacts of the trail group in SAM mode (even if that was not the smartest decision :D). But the missiles actually went after the target that was locked by Jaguar53 at this point.
https://imgur.com/HLPbnKz

AIM-120C5 successfully avoids target:
Well… I don’t really know what to say about this. Maybe you have some words?
https://imgur.com/67Z9BQU

Full tape:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/sjt15i8ksl0ids5/2022-05-16_FE-ITO.zip.acmi?dl=0

Disclaimer:
This was recorded in ITO and we know that you probably don’t care for any issues here. But maybe it’s worth to have a look at it.
Asking the ITO dev’s if something is wrong with their AIM-120C5 doesn’t seem to make sense as they would probably refer back to you.

@MaxWaldorf yes , full/ LOS ok I guess

@MaxWaldorf
Ok, got it, so it is configurable. Thanks.
The changelog making no mention of the config option confused me.

When in the 2dcockpit view there is in caps" MFDS - Instrument " right above the hud, is that supposed to be there ? When switching to 3d cockpit view it is gone. Is there some way to remove it from the top of the Hud?

@hoover said in High Number of Aborts in 4.36 (KTO):

So it’s no longer possible to task an escort flight for your strike flight in the same package with one human taking a seat in the strike flight and only AI pilots in the escort? I’m a bit confused.

Cheers, Uwe

LOL Hoover…
You have access to dev and still not aware??? I expect more of beta testers 😄

In short, fragged AI will depart unless you set the parameter:

NoAiForHumanControlledSqd

(check the manual for more details)

I think though that you wo’t be able to jump in a seat once the flight is RTB whether you set that parameter or not…

Cheers

@Crassus Hey , got it working!!!

Used photoshop and save-as TARGA , 16bpp , no-rle-compresion
Even no need to upside-down the pic… must be 96x96 pixels.

My photo showed in /Pictures directory just fine., in BMS.

So try like that … should be no problem,

Cheers

@Jackal It is not quite penetration , but rather air-“burst” 😄

@LorikEolmin
Thanks a lot and well done this time too, dear Lorik.

With best regards.

@Benney Are you talking about “eyebrowse” caution lights ? on left and right side of pit …
I can’t grasp what is blocking your view …pilot model shoulders maybe
Can you post pic ? just a cutout

How much you can move your head left exactly … should be almost to the “lights” switches - hud left vertical bracket should be in center of screen

Maybe what @mypc says is correct - maybe your translation curves in trackir/opentrack are set too small …

I don’t have any problems reaching any part of cockpit

Screenshot 2022-05-17 122221.png